Supreme Court of India
![GST on One-Time Premium: Supreme Court issues Notice to Govt [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/One-Time-Premium-GST-Taxscan.jpg "GST on One-Time Premium: Supreme Court issues Notice to Govt [Read Order]")
GST on One-Time Premium: Supreme Court issues Notice to Govt [Read Order]
The Builders Association of Navi Mumbai has approached the Supreme Court through a special leave petition challenging the order of the Bombay High...
![Homebuyers to be part of Insolvency Process: SC Orders Fresh bids for Jaypee Infra [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Jaypee-Infra-Supreme-Court-of-India-Taxscan.jpg "Homebuyers to be part of Insolvency Process: SC Orders Fresh bids for Jaypee Infra [Read Judgment]")
PIL in Supreme Court challenges Govt’s decision to withdraw 54% of the Pending Tax Cases [Read Petition]
A petition has been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the Government’s action increasing the threshold limit for filing departmental appeals at various appellate authorities, such as ITAT /...
![PIL in Supreme Court challenges Govt’s decision to withdraw 54% of the Pending Tax Cases [Read Petition]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Supreme-Court-of-India-Taxscan-min.jpg "PIL in Supreme Court challenges Govt’s decision to withdraw 54% of the Pending Tax Cases [Read Petition]")
Exemption Period of 10 years u/s 80-IC is to be calculated from the Initial Year of Substantial Expansion: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court in Mahabir Industries vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, held that the periods for which deductions were availed earlier by an assessee under Section 80-IA and Section 80-IB...
Material Found during Survey in the Premises of Person Connected to the Assessee Can Be Used in Block Assessment of the Assessee: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]
In CIT vs. S. Ajit Kumar, the Supreme Court held that the material found in the course of survey in the premises of a person connected to the assessee could be used in Block Assessment of the...
![Material Found during Survey in the Premises of Person Connected to the Assessee Can Be Used in Block Assessment of the Assessee: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Supreme-Court-of-India-Taxscan.jpg "Material Found during Survey in the Premises of Person Connected to the Assessee Can Be Used in Block Assessment of the Assessee: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]")
Amendment Made by The Finance Act, 2010 in Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act is Retrospective in Nature: SC [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court in CIT vs. M/s. Calcutta Export Company, held that the amendment made to section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act, 2010 being curative in nature, applies...
![Amendment Made by The Finance Act, 2010 in Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act is Retrospective in Nature: SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Finance-Act-Supreme-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Amendment Made by The Finance Act, 2010 in Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act is Retrospective in Nature: SC [Read Judgment]")
Benefit Received in the Nature of Cash or Money from Waiver of Loan is Non-Taxable under Section 28(iv) of IT Act: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]
In The Commissioner vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. the Supreme Court held that perquisite received in the form of waiver of loan cannot be taxed under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act,1961, if the...
A Larger Bench Should Decide if Supporting Manufacturers are entitled to Deductions at par with Direct Exporters: SC [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court has referred Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Carpet India to a larger bench for reconsideration. The issue before the apex court was whether the supporting manufacturer who...
![A Larger Bench Should Decide if Supporting Manufacturers are entitled to Deductions at par with Direct Exporters: SC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Deductions-Supreme-Court-of-India-Taxscan.jpg "A Larger Bench Should Decide if Supporting Manufacturers are entitled to Deductions at par with Direct Exporters: SC [Read Judgment]")