![Rectification Order by AO Neither Erroneous Nor Prejudicial, Revisionary Powers Misapplied on Rental Income Issue: ITAT quashes PCITs Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/26/500x300_2091215-rectification-order-income-tax-act-income-tax-act-without-proper-verification-proper-verification-itat-directs-re-adjudication-itat-taxscan.webp "Rectification Order by AO Neither Erroneous Nor Prejudicial, Revisionary Powers Misapplied on Rental Income Issue: ITAT quashes PCITs Order [Read Order]")
Rectification Order by AO Neither Erroneous Nor Prejudicial, Revisionary Powers Misapplied on Rental Income Issue: ITAT quashes PCIT's Order [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed the PCIT's order on the ground that it exceeded the revisionary powers...
![Challenge on Service Tax Demand on ‘Mandap Keeper Services’: Supreme Court Stays Chhattisgarh HC Remand Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/26/250x150_2091189-servicetax-demand-taxscan.webp "Challenge on Service Tax Demand on ‘Mandap Keeper Services’: Supreme Court Stays Chhattisgarh HC Remand Order [Read Order]")
![Relief for LG Electronics: Supreme Court Rules Classification Not Decisive when Customs Duty Exemption under India-Korea CEPA Applies [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/25/250x150_2091128-lg-electronics-supreme-court-customs-duty-taxscan.webp "Relief for LG Electronics: Supreme Court Rules Classification Not Decisive when Customs Duty Exemption under India-Korea CEPA Applies [Read Order]")
![Apollo Tyres’ Weighted Deduction Claim u/s 35(2AB) Rejected: Supreme Court Refuses to Re-open Case [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/25/250x150_2090991-appollo-tyres-taxscan.webp "Apollo Tyres’ Weighted Deduction Claim u/s 35(2AB) Rejected: Supreme Court Refuses to Re-open Case [Read Judgement]")
![Service Tax on Marketing of Film Songs on Sony Music: Supreme Court likely hear Matter on Next Month [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/25/250x150_2090983-service-tax-sony-music-entertainment-india-private-limited-film-songs-taxscan.webp "Service Tax on Marketing of Film Songs on Sony Music: Supreme Court likely hear Matter on Next Month [Read Judgement]")
VAT Exemption Only for Goods Produced in Same State is Discriminatory: Supreme Court Quashes Notification Violating Art. 304(a) [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court recently struck down a notification issued by the Government of Rajasthan under Section 8(3) of the Rajasthan VAT Act, 2003, which granted Value Added Tax (VAT) exemption...
![VAT Exemption Only for Goods Produced in Same State is Discriminatory: Supreme Court Quashes Notification Violating Art. 304(a) [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/25/500x300_2090953-vat-exemption-only-goods-produced-state-is-discriminatory-supreme-court-notification-violating-taxscan.webp "VAT Exemption Only for Goods Produced in Same State is Discriminatory: Supreme Court Quashes Notification Violating Art. 304(a) [Read Judgement]")
CLAT-PG Score not Valid for Public Employment to Legal Posts: Delhi HC Quashes NHAI’s Illegal Recruitment Criteria [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court recently held that the score obtained by a candidate in the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-PG) cannot be adopted as a criterion for public employment to legal posts, quashing...
![CLAT-PG Score not Valid for Public Employment to Legal Posts: Delhi HC Quashes NHAI’s Illegal Recruitment Criteria [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/24/500x300_2090602-clat-pg-score-delhi-high-court-nhais-taxscan.webp "CLAT-PG Score not Valid for Public Employment to Legal Posts: Delhi HC Quashes NHAI’s Illegal Recruitment Criteria [Read Order]")
Supreme Court Upholds 3 Years Suspension of Advocate for Making Scandalous Allegations Against an Individual [Read Order]
In a recent order, the Supreme Court of India upheld the 3-year suspension of advocate Manoj Kumar Sharma for making scandalous allegations against Priyanka Bansal and directed that no leniency be ...
![Supreme Court Upholds 3 Years Suspension of Advocate for Making Scandalous Allegations Against an Individual [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/24/500x300_2090511-supreme-court-upholds-suspension-scandalous-allegation-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court Upholds 3 Years Suspension of Advocate for Making Scandalous Allegations Against an Individual [Read Order]")
Setback for HDFC: CESTAT Rules Imported Rectangular Gold Pieces are Not Coins, Concessional Duty Benefit Denied [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that rectangular gold pieces imported by HDFC Bank without engraved serial numbers do not qualify as “gold...
![Setback for HDFC: CESTAT Rules Imported Rectangular Gold Pieces are Not Coins, Concessional Duty Benefit Denied [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/24/500x300_2090578-hdfc-taxscan.webp "Setback for HDFC: CESTAT Rules Imported Rectangular Gold Pieces are Not Coins, Concessional Duty Benefit Denied [Read Order]")
Handling Export Cargo falls within the ambit of “Taxable Services”: Supreme Court Dismisses Airports Authority's Appeal [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal filed by the Airports Authority of India (AAI), holding that the service of handling export cargo falls within the ambit of “taxable services” under the Finance...
![Handling Export Cargo falls within the ambit of “Taxable Services”: Supreme Court Dismisses Airports Authoritys Appeal [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/24/500x300_2090460-export-cargo-export-cargo-falls-taxable-services-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Handling Export Cargo falls within the ambit of “Taxable Services”: Supreme Court Dismisses Airports Authoritys Appeal [Read Judgement]")
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act Requires Verification of Loss: ITAT Orders Re-Examination [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, has remanded a penalty dispute involving concealment of income and inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for...
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act Requires Verification of Loss: ITAT Orders Re-Examination [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/23/500x300_2090163-tat-mumbai-income-tax-act-penalty-taxscanjpge.webp "Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act Requires Verification of Loss: ITAT Orders Re-Examination [Read Order]")
