![Supreme Court Reopens IBM India Case to Decide Whether Payments to IBM Philippines Are Taxable as Technical Services Despite DTAA Protection [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/04/2072944-supreme-court-ibm-dtaa-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court Reopens IBM India Case to Decide Whether Payments to IBM Philippines Are Taxable as Technical Services Despite DTAA Protection [Read Judgement]")
Supreme Court Reopens IBM India Case to Decide Whether Payments to IBM Philippines Are Taxable as Technical Services Despite DTAA Protection [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court of India reopened a previously dismissed case concerning the tax treatment of payments made by IBM India Pvt. Ltd. to IBM...
![Jharkhand Agricultural Marketing Board Not a Service Provider but Merely Supervisory: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/2071301-jharkhand-agricultural-marketing-service-provider-cestat-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "Jharkhand Agricultural Marketing Board Not a Service Provider but Merely Supervisory: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Relief to JSW Steel: Supreme Court upholds CESTAT Order Allowing Cenvat Credit [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/03/2072631-relief-jsw-steel-supreme-court-cestat-order-cenvat-credit-taxscan.webp "Relief to JSW Steel: Supreme Court upholds CESTAT Order Allowing Cenvat Credit [Read Judgement]")
![Supreme Court orders “Status quo on Pending NCLT Proceedings over JSW Steel Limited [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/03/2072623-supreme-court-status-quo-pending-nclt-proceedings-jsw-steel-limited-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court orders “Status quo on Pending NCLT Proceedings over JSW Steel Limited [Read Judgement]")
![Service of Excise Adjudication Order through Post Disputed: Supreme Court dismisses Case lacking Grounds to Interfere [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/02/2072446-service-of-excise-adjudication-order-excise-adjudication-order-taxscan.webp "Service of Excise Adjudication Order through Post Disputed: Supreme Court dismisses Case lacking Grounds to Interfere [Read Order]")
Limited Remanding Power of Authority u/s 107(11) on Procedural Lapse Cases: SC says ‘Let HC Deal with this’ [Read Order]
The Supreme Court of India recently addressed the legal question of whether an appellate authority under Section 107(11) of the Central Goods and Services Tax ( CGST ) Act is empowered to remand a...
![Limited Remanding Power of Authority u/s 107(11) on Procedural Lapse Cases: SC says ‘Let HC Deal with this’ [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/02/2072368-sc-on-gst-remand-taxscan.webp "Limited Remanding Power of Authority u/s 107(11) on Procedural Lapse Cases: SC says ‘Let HC Deal with this’ [Read Order]")
RTI Act Doesn’t Cover Opinions: IBBI Rejects RTI Appeals Seeking Legal Clarification on CIRP Provisions [Read Order]
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has dismissed two RTI appeals filed by appellant, who had sought detailed clarifications on provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code ...
![RTI Act Doesn’t Cover Opinions: IBBI Rejects RTI Appeals Seeking Legal Clarification on CIRP Provisions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/2071559-rti-act-cover-opinions-ibbi-rti-appeals-legal-clarification-cirp-provisions-taxscan.webp "RTI Act Doesn’t Cover Opinions: IBBI Rejects RTI Appeals Seeking Legal Clarification on CIRP Provisions [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Levy on Royalty, DMFT and NMET Payments: Supreme Court clubs Petitions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/02/2072314-service-tax-royalty-mining.webp "Service Tax Levy on Royalty, DMFT and NMET Payments: Supreme Court clubs Petitions [Read Order]")
Reassessment After 4 Years With Same Set of Facts Which Already Available During Original Assessment Legally Bad: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside the reassessment order and declared the reopening of the assessment for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 after 4 years with the...
![Reassessment After 4 Years With Same Set of Facts Which Already Available During Original Assessment Legally Bad: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/2071302-reassessment-set-of-facts-available-original-assessment-legally-bad-itat-taxscan.webp "Reassessment After 4 Years With Same Set of Facts Which Already Available During Original Assessment Legally Bad: ITAT [Read Order]")
GST Registration or Ownership Change Won’t Disqualify Units from Budgetary Support Scheme: Supreme Court Affirms HC Order [Read Judgement]
In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India upheld the decision of the Sikkim High Court, ruling that a change in GST registration or ownership does not affect a manufacturing unit’s...
![GST Registration or Ownership Change Won’t Disqualify Units from Budgetary Support Scheme: Supreme Court Affirms HC Order [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/2071498-gst-registration-ownership-change-disqualify-units-budgetary-support-scheme-supreme-court-hc-order-taxscan.webp "GST Registration or Ownership Change Won’t Disqualify Units from Budgetary Support Scheme: Supreme Court Affirms HC Order [Read Judgement]")
Himachal Pradesh High Court Stays Reassessment Proceedings Under Section 148, Awaits Supreme Court Verdict in Technical Textiles Case [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla stayed reassessment proceedings initiated against Prakash Chand Jadaik under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, pending the...
![Himachal Pradesh High Court Stays Reassessment Proceedings Under Section 148, Awaits Supreme Court Verdict in Technical Textiles Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/2071025-himachal-pradesh-high-court-himachal-pradesh-high-court-stays-reassessment-proceedings-taxscan.webp "Himachal Pradesh High Court Stays Reassessment Proceedings Under Section 148, Awaits Supreme Court Verdict in Technical Textiles Case [Read Order]")
Supreme Court reinstates Three-Year Experience Requirement for Civil Judge Aspirants, overhauls Judicial Promotion Quotas
In a recent judgment delivered on May 20, 2025, the Supreme Court of India restored the requirement of three years’ actual legal practice for candidates appearing in the Civil Judge (Junior Division)...
