![Debit Notes already issued on Reimbursable Expenses: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chennai-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Demand-Debit-Notes-Reimbursable-Expenses-taxscan.jpg "Debit Notes already issued on Reimbursable Expenses: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
Debit Notes already issued on Reimbursable Expenses: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]
In a significant ruling, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), Chennai Bench quashed a service tax demand related to...
![‘Abuse of Process of Law Cannot be Permitted’: MP HC Bars GST Authorities invoking IPC Provisions without applying GST Penal Provisions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GST-Madhya-Pradesh-HC-Abuse-of-Process-of-Law-GST-Authorities-IPC-Provisions-taxscan.jpg "‘Abuse of Process of Law Cannot be Permitted’: MP HC Bars GST Authorities invoking IPC Provisions without applying GST Penal Provisions [Read Order]")
![Once Development Commissioner grants Permission, it cannot be Challenged by Revenue: CESTAT sets aside Excise Duty Recovery Orders on Cipla Ltd [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Excise-Duty-Recovery-Excise-Duty-Development-Commissioner-taxscan.jpg "Once Development Commissioner grants Permission, it cannot be Challenged by Revenue: CESTAT sets aside Excise Duty Recovery Orders on Cipla Ltd [Read Order]")
![Second Provisional Attachment Order u/s 83 of GST Act cannot be issued without Fresh Reasons: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GST-provisional-attachment-order-Attachment-order-under-Section-83-TAXSCAN.jpg "Second Provisional Attachment Order u/s 83 of GST Act cannot be issued without Fresh Reasons: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Liability for tax cannot be imposed on petitioner after the vehicle was taken by financier: Allahabad HC quashed recovery citation against petitioner [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court quashed the recovery citation against the petitioner and held that the Liability for payment of motor vehicle tax cannot be imposed on the petitioner after the vehicle was...
Supreme Court reaffirms non-Taxable Nature of Receipts for Computer Software Access to Member Firms [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court has recently dismissed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), Income Tax Department against taxability of payments received...
25-Day Appeal Delay Due to Election Code of Conduct and Staff Ill Health: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT (A) [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has restored the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) following a 25-day delay in the appeal, which was attributed to...
![25-Day Appeal Delay Due to Election Code of Conduct and Staff Ill Health: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT (A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Appeal-Delay-Election-Code-of-Conduct-Staff-Ill-Health-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "25-Day Appeal Delay Due to Election Code of Conduct and Staff Ill Health: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT (A) [Read Order]")
Relief to Ericsson: Supreme Court upholds deletion of ₹64.43 Cr Penalty u/s 271G of Income Tax Act [Read Judgement]
In a significant relief to Ericsson India Private Limited, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty,...
![Relief to Ericsson: Supreme Court upholds deletion of ₹64.43 Cr Penalty u/s 271G of Income Tax Act [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Supreme-Court-Ericsson-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Ericsson-India-penalty-Section-271G-Income-Tax-Act-Ericsson-India-tax-penalty-case-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Ericsson: Supreme Court upholds deletion of ₹64.43 Cr Penalty u/s 271G of Income Tax Act [Read Judgement]")
Dispute on 10% Pre-deposit for GST Appeal from ECRL or ECL: Patna HC Directs Appeal to Be Considered on Merits Pending SC Decision [Read Order]
In a matter of dispute over the payment source of 10% pre-deposit for filing GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) appeal from the Electronic Credit ledger ( ECRL ) or Electronic Cash Ledger ( ECL ),...
![Dispute on 10% Pre-deposit for GST Appeal from ECRL or ECL: Patna HC Directs Appeal to Be Considered on Merits Pending SC Decision [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Patna-High-Court-GST-GST-Appeal-ECRL-Electronic-Credit-ledger-Electronic-Cash-Ledger-taxscan.jpg "Dispute on 10% Pre-deposit for GST Appeal from ECRL or ECL: Patna HC Directs Appeal to Be Considered on Merits Pending SC Decision [Read Order]")
Statements recorded by Authorities are “Admissible Evidence” under PMLA, proceedings are deemed ‘Judicial’: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court observed that as per sub-section (4) thereof every proceeding under sub-sections (2) and (3) is deemed to be a Judicial proceeding within the meaning of Section 193 and Section 228...
