![Rajasthan HC Directs Income Tax Dept to Refund Rs. 24.06 Lakh with 12% Interest for Withholding Money without Demand Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/2087642-rajasthan-hc-income-tax-dept-refund-interest-money-demand-order-taxscan.webp "Rajasthan HC Directs Income Tax Dept to Refund Rs. 24.06 Lakh with 12% Interest for Withholding Money without Demand Order [Read Order]")
Rajasthan HC Directs Income Tax Dept to Refund Rs. 24.06 Lakh with 12% Interest for Withholding Money without Demand Order [Read Order]
The Rajasthan High Court ruled that the Income Tax Department could not retain money collected during a search without passing a valid demand order,...
![Not Business Income, But Still Deductible; ITAT Sides with Kerala Co-op Bank, Quashes Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/20/2078718-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "Not Business Income, But Still Deductible; ITAT Sides with Kerala Co-op Bank, Quashes Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![GST Dept cannot Recover Demand prior to Expiry of Statutory Period for Filing Appeal: Calcutta HC says Dept Committed ‘Grave Error’ [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/11/2075769-statutory-period-for-filing-appeal-calcutta-hc-taxscan.webp "GST Dept cannot Recover Demand prior to Expiry of Statutory Period for Filing Appeal: Calcutta HC says Dept Committed ‘Grave Error’ [Read Order]")
![GST Order Demand Triples the Proposed Tax in SCN Without Prior Notice: Madras HC sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/09/2074720-gst-order-madras-high-court-gst-order-demand-taxscan.webp "GST Order Demand Triples the Proposed Tax in SCN Without Prior Notice: Madras HC sets aside Order [Read Order]")
Delhi HC Stays ₹1,140 Crore Angel Tax Demand Against OYO, Offering Temporary Relief Ahead of IPO Plans
In a recent development, the Delhi High Court stayed a Rs. 1,140 crore angel tax demand raised by the Income Tax Department against Oravel Stays Pvt. Ltd, the parent company of travel tech firm OYO,...
Putting up Non-Commercial Signages on their Property: Karnataka HC Sets aside Ad Tax Demand on Educational Institutions [Read Order]
While setting aside a demand for advertisement tax against an educational institution, the Karnataka High Court has held that in the absence of any commercial or promotional content, advertisement...
![Putting up Non-Commercial Signages on their Property: Karnataka HC Sets aside Ad Tax Demand on Educational Institutions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/02/2058248-karnataka-high-court-educational-institution-ad-tax-demand.webp "Putting up Non-Commercial Signages on their Property: Karnataka HC Sets aside Ad Tax Demand on Educational Institutions [Read Order]")
ITAT Condones 873 Day Delay in Filing Appeal due to COVID-19, Remands Matter to CIT(A) for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Agra Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), in its recent ruling condoned delay in filing appeals that had previously been dismissed as time-barred by the Commissioner of Income-tax...
![ITAT Condones 873 Day Delay in Filing Appeal due to COVID-19, Remands Matter to CIT(A) for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/27/2055167-itat-condones-873-day-delay-condones-day-delay-filing-appeal-due-appeal-due-to-covid-19-taxscan.webp "ITAT Condones 873 Day Delay in Filing Appeal due to COVID-19, Remands Matter to CIT(A) for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Gauhati HC Grants CST Section 6(2) Benefit Despite Non-Furnishing of ‘C’ Forms, Citing Uncontested Inter-State Movement of Goods [Read Order]
The Gauhati High Court held that the benefit under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax (CST) Act, 1956, cannot be denied merely due to the non-furnishing of ‘C’ Forms, especially when the...
![Gauhati HC Grants CST Section 6(2) Benefit Despite Non-Furnishing of ‘C’ Forms, Citing Uncontested Inter-State Movement of Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/14/2044379-gauhati-hc-taxscan.webp "Gauhati HC Grants CST Section 6(2) Benefit Despite Non-Furnishing of ‘C’ Forms, Citing Uncontested Inter-State Movement of Goods [Read Order]")
