Read all Latest Updates on and about unexplained investment

Top

Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Home
»
unexplained investment

Absence of Seller before AO not Ground to Allege Unexplained Investment: ITAT Deletes Addition u/s 69B of Income Tax Act [Read Order]

Kalyani B. Nair

The Indore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), deletes addition under Section 69B of the Income Tax Act and noted that the absence of...

ITAT deletes Addition u/s 68B of IT Act on Unexplained Investment: Gujarat HC issues Returnable...

Use of Building by Assessee-Trust without consideration is not Unexplained Investment: ITAT [Read...

Addition of Unexplained Investment of Land is permissible in the absence of explanation by Cash Flow...

Arrangement b/w Husband and Wife without Real Money Exchange not amount to Unexplained Investment...

Mentioning of PAN does not attribute Transaction or Credit to Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), New Delhi held that mentioning PAN does not attribute transaction or credit to an assessee. The department, Shri Madhav Kumar Swarup, claimed to have been...

ITAT upholds Additions on account of Unexplained Investment in FDR [Read Order]

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad Bench upheld the additions on account of unexplained investment in FDR. The assessee, Mrs. Shaheen Khan filed his return of income with Revenue...

ITAT quashes Addition of alleged Unexplained Investment as Assessee discharged Onus of Explaining Transactions [Read Order]

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad Bench quashed the addition of alleged unexplained investment as the assessee discharged the onus of explaining transactions. The Revenue’s sole...

Past Savings kept in Locker not Unexplained Investment If Source is Explained: ITAT [Read Order]

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Indore bench has held that the past savings kept in the bank locker cannot be treated as Unexplained Investment merely for the reason that the amount was not...

Streedhan saved by Indian Ladies can’t be treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT [Read Order]

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Indore bench has held that the streedhan saved by Indian women cannot be treated as an unexplained investment for the purpose of addition under section 69 of...

Jewellery received during Marriage can’t be treated as Unexplained: ITAT [Read Order]

The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) last week held that the jewellery received by assessee at the time of marriage cannot be treated as unexplained under the provisions of...

No addition since Assessee furnished Identity of Creditors and Entire Loan transaction was done through Regular Banking Channel: ITAT [Read Order]

The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) recently held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be made since the identity of the creditors have been...

Prev Page Next Page