![Punjab & Haryana HC allows Filing of Application for Revocation of Cancellation of Registration where GST Registration was cancelled due to Non-furnishing of GST Returns [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/GST-Registration-taxscan.jpeg "Punjab & Haryana HC allows Filing of Application for Revocation of Cancellation of Registration where GST Registration was cancelled due to Non-furnishing of GST Returns [Read Order]")
Punjab & Haryana HC allows Filing of Application for Revocation of Cancellation of Registration where GST Registration was cancelled due to Non-furnishing of GST Returns [Read Order]
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has allowed the assessee to file application for Revocation of Cancellation of Registration wherein GST...
![Authorised Officer conducting Search, Seizure can’t retain Documents beyond 15 days, so officer can’t encash IVP without Documents: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/97a4c681-34fa-4ec5-8645-7925f3db426d.jpg "Authorised Officer conducting Search, Seizure can’t retain Documents beyond 15 days, so officer can’t encash IVP without Documents: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
![Writ Petition not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy is available for under MVAT Act: Bombay High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Writ-Petition-MVAT-Act-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpeg "Writ Petition not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy is available for under MVAT Act: Bombay High Court [Read Order]")
![Writ Petition not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy is available for challenging Re-Assessment Orders under TNVAT Act: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Writ-Petition-Statutory-Alternative-Remedy-re-assessment-TNVAT-Act-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpeg "Writ Petition not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy is available for challenging Re-Assessment Orders under TNVAT Act: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Writ Petition not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy under GST Act: Madras High Court [Read Order]
The Madras High Court ruled that the writ petition is not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy under GST Act. Mr.G.Natarajan, learned counsel for writ petitioner, M/s. Steel Centre in all...
![Writ Petition not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy under GST Act: Madras High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Writ-Petition-Statutory-Alternative-Remedy-GST-Act-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpeg "Writ Petition not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy under GST Act: Madras High Court [Read Order]")
Writ Petition in High Court not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy is available at NCLAT: Delhi High Court [Read Judgment]
The Delhi High Court ruled that the writ petition in High Court is not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy is available at National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The only basis...
![Writ Petition in High Court not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy is available at NCLAT: Delhi High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Writ-Petition-Statutory-Alternative-Remedy-NCLAT-Delhi-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Writ Petition in High Court not maintainable as Statutory Alternative Remedy is available at NCLAT: Delhi High Court [Read Judgment]")
Writ Petition in High Court not maintainable If Statutory Alternative Remedy is available under CGST Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]
The Supreme Court while allowing the appeal of the revenue ruled that the Writ petition in High Court is not maintainable if statutory alternative remedy is available under CGST Act. The...
![Writ Petition in High Court not maintainable If Statutory Alternative Remedy is available under CGST Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Writ-petition-High-Court-statutory-CGST-Act-Superme-Course-Taxscan.jpeg "Writ Petition in High Court not maintainable If Statutory Alternative Remedy is available under CGST Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]")
Writ Petition not maintainable against Show Cause Notice under GST during Assessment Proceedings: Rajasthan High Court [Read Order]
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the GST Appeal as the matter is at the stage of show cause notice and an opportunity hearing is still available. The petitioner, Genus Power Infrastructure Ltd....
![Writ Petition not maintainable against Show Cause Notice under GST during Assessment Proceedings: Rajasthan High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Writ-Petition-Show-Cause-Notice-GST-Assessment-Proceedings-Rajasthan-High-Court-Taxscan.jpeg "Writ Petition not maintainable against Show Cause Notice under GST during Assessment Proceedings: Rajasthan High Court [Read Order]")
Writ Petition not maintainable against an appealable Assessment Order: Madras High Court [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has recently dismissed a writ petition filed by an assessee by observing that a writ petition cannot be maintainable if the same is filed against an appealable assessment order....
![Writ Petition not maintainable against an appealable Assessment Order: Madras High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Writ-Petition-Assessment-Order-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Writ Petition not maintainable against an appealable Assessment Order: Madras High Court [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court upholds provisions of IBC on Corporate Debt Recovery from Personal Guarantors [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Supreme-Court-IBC-Corporate-Debt-Recovery-Personal-Guarantors-taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court upholds provisions of IBC on Corporate Debt Recovery from Personal Guarantors [Read Judgment]")
Purchaser not entitled to claim Refund of Excise Duty paid under Protest after the expiry of limitation period of 6 Months: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court ruled that the purchaser is not entitled to claim refund of excise duty paid under protest after the expiry of limitation period of 6 Months. The petitioner,...
![Purchaser not entitled to claim Refund of Excise Duty paid under Protest after the expiry of limitation period of 6 Months: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/refund-of-excise-duty-madras-high-court-taxscan.jpg "Purchaser not entitled to claim Refund of Excise Duty paid under Protest after the expiry of limitation period of 6 Months: Madras HC [Read Order]")