Taxpayer Can Claim DTAA Exemption for Pre-April 2017 Gains and Still Carry Forward Post-April 2017 Losses Under Income Tax Act [Read Order]

ITAT ruled that capital gains exempt under the India-Mauritius DTAA for shares acquired before April 2017 cannot be offset by post-2017 capital losses, which may be carried forward under Indian tax law
Taxpayer Can Claim DTAA - DTAA - DTAA Exemption - taxscan

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that a taxpayer can avail capital gains exemption under the India-Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) for shares acquired before April 1, 2017, and still carry forward capital losses under Indian domestic tax law for shares acquired thereafter.

TVF Fund Ltd. (assessee), a company incorporated in Mauritius and registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as an FPI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year (AY) 2021–22.

The assessee claimed exemption under Article 13(3) and 13(4) of the India-Mauritius DTAA, as they were taxable in Mauritius based on the assessee’s residency. The Assessing Officer (AO) set off brought forward short-term capital losses of Rs. 9.94 crore and long-term capital losses of Rs. 45.67 crore from AY 2020–21.

Read More: Prima Facie Adjustment of ESI/PF Disallowance u/s 143(1)(a) Not Permissible during Pendency of Debatable Checkmate Case before SC: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]

The AO brought long-term capital losses of Rs. 11.29 crore incurred during AY 2021–22, against the exempt gains. The AO argued that the computation of capital gains must follow the provisions of the Income Tax Act before applying DTAA benefits, resulting in a net taxable gain. The AO computed the total income at Rs. 35.61 crore, raising a demand of Rs. 2.33 crore.

DTAA – How to deal with FOREIGN TAX CREDIT? Click Here

On appeal, the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld the AO’s computation. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee appealed to the ITAT. The Counsel for the assessee argued that the gains from shares acquired before April 1, 2017, were exempt under the pre-amended Article 13 of the DTAA, as India had no taxation rights over such gains.

The counsel further contended that losses from shares acquired post-April 1, 2017, which were taxable in India, could not be set off against exempt gains and should be carried forward. The counsel relied on precedents to support their claim that the assessee could avail DTAA benefits for gains while claiming loss carry-forward under the Act.

DTAA – How to deal with FOREIGN TAX CREDIT? Click Here

The revenue argued that the tax liability must first be computed under the Income Tax Act, including provisions for set-off under Sections 70 and 74, before applying DTAA benefits.

The two-member bench comprising Beena Pillai (Judicial Member) and Padmavathy S (Accountant Member) observed that gains from shares acquired prior to April 1, 2017, were exempt under Article 13(3) and 13(4) of the DTAA, as India had relinquished its taxation rights for such gains.

Read More: Validity of GST Portal Notice Service: Madras HC Sets Aside Ex Parte Order Due to Ineffective Communication [Read Order]

The tribunal also observed that these gains did not form part of the assessee’s total income under the Income Tax Act, so no losses could be set off against them. The tribunal further observed that the losses in question arose from shares acquired after April 1, 2017, which were taxable in India and could only be set off against similar taxable gains in future years.

The tribunal ruled that the assessee was entitled to carry forward the brought forward losses and current year losses under Section 74 of the Income Tax Act, citing CBDT Circular No. 22 of 1944 and judicial precedents.

The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.

Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the Judgment

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

taxscan-loader