![Late Application for Registration u/s 80G(5) withdrawn: ITAT directs CIT(E) to consider Fresh Application [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpeg "Late Application for Registration u/s 80G(5) withdrawn: ITAT directs CIT(E) to consider Fresh Application [Read Order]")
Late Application for Registration u/s 80G(5) withdrawn: ITAT directs CIT(E) to consider Fresh Application [Read Order]
In the recent ruling, the Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) directed Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) [CIT(E)] to...
![GST ITC Mismatch : Madras HC allows to Substantiate defence on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-ITC-Pre-deposit-Pre-deposit-Taxscan.jpg "GST ITC Mismatch : Madras HC allows to Substantiate defence on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]")
No ITC available on Purchase of ‘Rotary Car Parking System’ u/s 17(5)(d), CGST Act: AAAR [Read Order]
The Tamilnadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling ( AAAR ) ruled that no Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) can be availed on the purchase of Rotary Car Parking System installed and commissioned at...
![No ITC available on Purchase of ‘Rotary Car Parking System’ u/s 17(5)(d), CGST Act: AAAR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Input-Tax-Credit-ITC-Rotary-Car-Parking-System-Goods-and-Services-Tax-ITC-on-Rotary-Car-Parking-System-taxscan.jpg "No ITC available on Purchase of ‘Rotary Car Parking System’ u/s 17(5)(d), CGST Act: AAAR [Read Order]")
GST Order Prematurely passed 10 days before Expiration of Time Limit to Reply: Madras HC quashes Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has quashed a Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) assessment order issued prematurely by GST authorities that is 10 days expiration of the time limit for filing reply, citing a...
![GST Order Prematurely passed 10 days before Expiration of Time Limit to Reply: Madras HC quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Goods-and-Services-Tax-GST-Order-Madras-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Order Prematurely passed 10 days before Expiration of Time Limit to Reply: Madras HC quashes Order [Read Order]")
Clearance for Non-Forest use of Land and NPV Charges do not constitute 'Declared Service' u/s 66E(e) of Finance Act: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal quashes the service tax demand order holding that clearance for non-forest use of land and Net Present Value ( NPV ) charges do...
![Clearance for Non-Forest use of Land and NPV Charges do not constitute Declared Service u/s 66E(e) of Finance Act: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Kolkata-non-forest-land-use-tax-on-forest-land-use-NPV-charges-Net-Present-Value-taxscan.jpg "Clearance for Non-Forest use of Land and NPV Charges do not constitute Declared Service u/s 66E(e) of Finance Act: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
Revenue Neutrality in Service Tax Matter: CESTAT quashes Invocation of Extended Period of Limitation [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) while adjudging a matter pertaining to the payability of Service Tax by an Indian entity availing services from...
![Revenue Neutrality in Service Tax Matter: CESTAT quashes Invocation of Extended Period of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-Kolkata-Service-Tax-Matter-Cases-Service-Tax-in-Indian-TAXSCAN.webp "Revenue Neutrality in Service Tax Matter: CESTAT quashes Invocation of Extended Period of Limitation [Read Order]")
Sub-contractor Challenges Service Tax Demand Citing Main Contractor already made Payment: CESTAT directs Adjudicating Authority to Verify Document [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for verification of documents in a case where a...
![Sub-contractor Challenges Service Tax Demand Citing Main Contractor already made Payment: CESTAT directs Adjudicating Authority to Verify Document [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Kolkata-Adjudicating-Authority-Service-Tax-Demand-Taxscan.jpg "Sub-contractor Challenges Service Tax Demand Citing Main Contractor already made Payment: CESTAT directs Adjudicating Authority to Verify Document [Read Order]")
Rule 11UA Allows 10% Tolerance Limit for Differences Between Issue Price and FMV, No Additions Required u/s 56(2)(viib): ITAT
The Chennai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that no addition was required under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax, 1961 if the difference between the issue price and Fair...
