Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![S.68 Invocable Only If Taxpayer Maintain Books: ITAT deletes Addition as Returns Filed u/s 44AD [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Amritstar-Income-Tax-Appellate-Authority-Section-68-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Deletes-Addition-taxscan.jpg "S.68 Invocable Only If Taxpayer Maintain Books: ITAT deletes Addition as Returns Filed u/s 44AD [Read Order]")
S.68 Invocable Only If Taxpayer Maintain Books: ITAT deletes Addition as Returns Filed u/s 44AD [Read Order]
The Amritsar Bench of Income Tax Appellate Authority ( ITAT ) ruled that Section 68 of the Income Tax Act,1961 can only be invoked if the taxpayer...
![Relief to Alukkas Jewellery: Settlement Commission Unauthorized to Rectify Orders Pre-2011 Income Tax Amendment, Rules Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Delhi-High-Court-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Settlement-Commission-ITSC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Alukkas Jewellery: Settlement Commission Unauthorized to Rectify Orders Pre-2011 Income Tax Amendment, Rules Madras HC [Read Order]")
![Relief to Tata Group subsidiary Infiniti Retail Ltd. (Croma): Delhi HC quashes SCN issued Unilaterally Neglecting Submissions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Delhi-High-Court-Delhi-HC-Relief-to-Tata-Group-Show-Cause-Notice-SCN-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Tata Group subsidiary Infiniti Retail Ltd. (Croma): Delhi HC quashes SCN issued Unilaterally Neglecting Submissions [Read Order]")
![IT Software Services Provided by Wipro Limited to SEZ Units Fully Exempted from Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-CESTAT-Chennai-Software-Software-Services-IT-Software-IT-Software-Services-Wipro-TAXSCAN.jpg "IT Software Services Provided by Wipro Limited to SEZ Units Fully Exempted from Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![S.75(5) of GST Act Violated By Denying Opportunity to be Heard: Madras HC Quashes Adverse GST Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/S.755-of-GST-Act-Madras-HC-GST-Order-TAXSCAN.jpg "S.75(5) of GST Act Violated By Denying Opportunity to be Heard: Madras HC Quashes Adverse GST Order [Read Order]")
![University’s Income from Affiliation Not Subject to Service Tax: Karnataka HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Karnataka-HC-Karnataka-High-Court-Universitys-Income-Universitys-Income-from-Affiliation-Service-Tax-show-cause-notices-affiliation-fees-taxscan.jpg "University’s Income from Affiliation Not Subject to Service Tax: Karnataka HC [Read Order]")
Section 14A Amendment Clarification Is Not Retrospective If It Alters Existing Law: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that the amendment to Section 14A of the Income tax Act, 1961 which aimed to clarify the law, cannot be applied retrospectively if it...
![Section 14A Amendment Clarification Is Not Retrospective If It Alters Existing Law: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Law-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Section 14A Amendment Clarification Is Not Retrospective If It Alters Existing Law: ITAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Rule 26 due to Lack of Confiscation and Invoice Involvement [Read Order]
In the recent ruling, the Ahmedabad bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) set aside the Rs. 50,00,000 penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26 of the Central...
![CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Rule 26 due to Lack of Confiscation and Invoice Involvement [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-Ahmedabad-CESTAT-penalty-under-Rule-26-CESTAT-Invoice-Case-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Rule 26 due to Lack of Confiscation and Invoice Involvement [Read Order]")