Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![“GST Registration Not Substitute for Licensing under Brick Kiln Act”: J&K HC Upholds Seizure Orders on Brick Dealers [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110608-gst-registration-substitute-licensing-brick-kiln-act-orders-brick-dealers-taxscan.webp "“GST Registration Not Substitute for Licensing under Brick Kiln Act”: J&K HC Upholds Seizure Orders on Brick Dealers [Read Order]")
“GST Registration Not Substitute for Licensing under Brick Kiln Act”: J&K HC Upholds Seizure Orders on Brick Dealers [Read Order]
In a recent case, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir has clarified the relationship between Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration and...
![J&K HC Holds Licensing Mandate u/r 3 of Brick Kiln (Regulation) Rules, 2017, Not in Violation of Article 19(1)(g) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/250x150_2110591-jk-hc-holds-licensing-brick-kiln-rules-taxscan.webp "J&K HC Holds Licensing Mandate u/r 3 of Brick Kiln (Regulation) Rules, 2017, Not in Violation of Article 19(1)(g) [Read Order]")
![Respondents’ Admission of Demand Notice in SC Pleadings Overrides Technical Objections: NCLAT Sets Aside Rejection of SBI’s Application u/s 95 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/250x150_2110604-respondents-admission-demand-notice-sc-pleadings-technical-objections-nclat-rejection-sbi-taxscan.webp "Respondents’ Admission of Demand Notice in SC Pleadings Overrides Technical Objections: NCLAT Sets Aside Rejection of SBI’s Application u/s 95 [Read Order]")
![UAE Company Earned ₹4+ Cr Interest in India, No ITR Required Despite TDS: Here’s Why [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/250x150_2110979-uae-company-earned-interest-india-itr-required-despite-tds.webp "UAE Company Earned ₹4+ Cr Interest in India, No ITR Required Despite TDS: Here’s Why [Read Order]")
![EPF Dues have First Charge Over Secured Creditors under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/05/500x300_2110242-epf-dues-first-charge-secured-creditors-sarfaesi-act-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "EPF Dues have First Charge Over Secured Creditors under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]")
![Faceless Assessment Mandatory: Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes S.148 Notice Issued by JAO [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/05/500x300_2110235-punjab-and-haryana-hc-taxscan.jfif "Faceless Assessment Mandatory: Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes S.148 Notice Issued by JAO [Read Order]")
![Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) Inapplicable to Sister-Concern Loans: ITAT Deletes Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2110916-itat-ahmedabad-loans-deemed-dividend-sister-concern-inapplicable-itat-deletes-addition-taxscan.webp "Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) Inapplicable to Sister-Concern Loans: ITAT Deletes Addition [Read Order]")
Old v/s New Limitation: ITAT Quashes AY 2013‑14 Reopening as Old Regime Bars Reassessment Despite New 10‑Year Rule u/s 149 [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Chennai, has struck down reassessment proceedings against the respondent for Assessment Year (AY) 2013‑14, holding that the notice...
![Old v/s New Limitation: ITAT Quashes AY 2013‑14 Reopening as Old Regime Bars Reassessment Despite New 10‑Year Rule u/s 149 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2110910-itat-chennai-reassessment-old-vs-new-limitation-reopening-old-regime-bars-taxscan.webp "Old v/s New Limitation: ITAT Quashes AY 2013‑14 Reopening as Old Regime Bars Reassessment Despite New 10‑Year Rule u/s 149 [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC Reaffirms Concurrent Powers of JAO and FAO to Issue S.148 Reassessment Notices [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110522-reassessment-notices-taxscan.jfif "Delhi HC Reaffirms Concurrent Powers of JAO and FAO to Issue S.148 Reassessment Notices [Read Order]")
Calcutta HC Rejects S.68 Appeal as Tax Effect Falls Below ₹2 Crore Limit Under Circular No. 9/2024 [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court declined to entertain a revenue appeal challenging the deletion of an addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the tax effect involved was...
![Calcutta HC Rejects S.68 Appeal as Tax Effect Falls Below ₹2 Crore Limit Under Circular No. 9/2024 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110545-appeal-tax-effect-falls-below-crore-limit-taxscan.webp "Calcutta HC Rejects S.68 Appeal as Tax Effect Falls Below ₹2 Crore Limit Under Circular No. 9/2024 [Read Order]")
![Reverse Charge Demand Sets Aside: CESTAT Says Tax Beyond Scope of SCN Unsustainable [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/05/500x300_2110258-reverse-charge-demand-cestat-tax-scn-unsustainable-taxscan.webp "Reverse Charge Demand Sets Aside: CESTAT Says Tax Beyond Scope of SCN Unsustainable [Read Order]")