![Final Income Tax Order already Passed in 2009: Calcutta HC Dismisses writ against S. 148 Notice as Infructuous after 15 years [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/30/500x300_2100991-final-income-tax-order-income-tax-order-calcutta-hc-income-tax-order-already-passed-taxscan.webp "Final Income Tax Order already Passed in 2009: Calcutta HC Dismisses writ against S. 148 Notice as Infructuous after 15 years [Read Order]")
Final Income Tax Order already Passed in 2009: Calcutta HC Dismisses writ against S. 148 Notice as Infructuous after 15 years [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that...
![GST on Corporate Guarantee: Madras HC Quashes Order for Non-Consideration of CBIC Circulars, Remands to AO [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/30/250x150_2100987-gst-on-corporate-guarantee-madras-hc-order-for-non-consideration-cbic-circulars-taxscan.webp "GST on Corporate Guarantee: Madras HC Quashes Order for Non-Consideration of CBIC Circulars, Remands to AO [Read Order]")
![VAT Tribunal must Consider all Grounds Raised By Dealer: Gujarat HC Remands Assessment Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/30/250x150_2100951-vat-hc-order-taxscan.webp "VAT Tribunal must Consider all Grounds Raised By Dealer: Gujarat HC Remands Assessment Matter [Read Order]")
Exemption u/s 10(25)(ii) Denied for Filing Return in Wrong Form: ITAT says it’s Procedural Lapse, Restores Matter to AO [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) restored matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) after holding that denial of exemption under Section 10(25)(ii) merely due to filing the ...
![Exemption u/s 10(25)(ii) Denied for Filing Return in Wrong Form: ITAT says it’s Procedural Lapse, Restores Matter to AO [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/29/500x300_2100857-exemption-filing-return-in-wrong-form-itat-procedural-lapse-restores-matter-taxscan.webp "Exemption u/s 10(25)(ii) Denied for Filing Return in Wrong Form: ITAT says it’s Procedural Lapse, Restores Matter to AO [Read Order]")
Sale of Ancestral Property and Reinvestment in More than One Residential Units: Delhi HC says Multiple Investments Eligible for Exemption u/s 54 [Read Order]
The bench of the Delhi High Court ruled that exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is not confined to investment in a single residential property. The Court upheld that...
![Sale of Ancestral Property and Reinvestment in More than One Residential Units: Delhi HC says Multiple Investments Eligible for Exemption u/s 54 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/29/500x300_2100819-sale-of-ancestral-property-ancestral-property-ancestral-property-and-reinvestment-taxscan.webp "Sale of Ancestral Property and Reinvestment in More than One Residential Units: Delhi HC says Multiple Investments Eligible for Exemption u/s 54 [Read Order]")
Entire Sale Consideration ₹55.80 Lakh Treated as STCG: ITAT Restores Ex-Parte Assessment Citing Delay Due to Non-Registration on IT Portal [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the ex-parte assessment order and remitted the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer (AO) for a fresh ...
![Entire Sale Consideration ₹55.80 Lakh Treated as STCG: ITAT Restores Ex-Parte Assessment Citing Delay Due to Non-Registration on IT Portal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/30/500x300_2100919-short-term-capital-gain-taxscan.webp "Entire Sale Consideration ₹55.80 Lakh Treated as STCG: ITAT Restores Ex-Parte Assessment Citing Delay Due to Non-Registration on IT Portal [Read Order]")
Relevant Date for Export Duty is Date of Let Export Order, Not Loading Date: CESTAT in Bharat Mines Case [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the relevant date for determining the rate of export duty is the date on which the Let Export Order ...
![Relevant Date for Export Duty is Date of Let Export Order, Not Loading Date: CESTAT in Bharat Mines Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/29/500x300_2100809-export-cestat-chennai-bharat-mines-case-taxscan.webp "Relevant Date for Export Duty is Date of Let Export Order, Not Loading Date: CESTAT in Bharat Mines Case [Read Order]")
Relief for BOI: NCLT Admits Section 7 Plea under IBC after Finding Corporate Debtor in Default of ₹153.98 Crore [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT ) admitted a Section 7 application filed by Bank of India under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, after finding the corporate debtor in...
![Relief for BOI: NCLT Admits Section 7 Plea under IBC after Finding Corporate Debtor in Default of ₹153.98 Crore [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/29/500x300_2100815-boi-nclt-section-7-plea-ibc-corporate-debtor-txn.webp "Relief for BOI: NCLT Admits Section 7 Plea under IBC after Finding Corporate Debtor in Default of ₹153.98 Crore [Read Order]")