![Supreme Court refused to condone 431 Days Delay in filing Customs Appeal [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085789-customs-appeal-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court refused to condone 431 Days Delay in filing Customs Appeal [Read Judgement]")
Supreme Court refused to condone 431 Days Delay in filing Customs Appeal [Read Judgement]
A two-judge bench of Pankaj Mithal and Prasanna B. Varale dismissed the appeal on ground of delay. The appeal arose out of impugned final judgment and...
![Air Curtains Not Electrical Fans: Madras HC upholds 12% Sales Tax Levy, dismisses Petition of Almonard Limited [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/250x150_2085784-air-curtains-taxscan.webp "Air Curtains Not Electrical Fans: Madras HC upholds 12% Sales Tax Levy, dismisses Petition of Almonard Limited [Read Order]")
![Failure to Disclose Acquisition of Family Property: Madras HC Sets Aside CAT Order Granting Notional Promotion to Customs Officer [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/250x150_2085778-site-image-1.webp "Failure to Disclose Acquisition of Family Property: Madras HC Sets Aside CAT Order Granting Notional Promotion to Customs Officer [Read Order]")
![GST Appeal Filed with 150-Day Delay: Madras HC Condones Delay Subject to Additional 5% Deposit with 10% [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/250x150_2085773-gst-appea-madras-hc-taxscan.webp "GST Appeal Filed with 150-Day Delay: Madras HC Condones Delay Subject to Additional 5% Deposit with 10% [Read Order]")
![Reversal of ITC u/s 19(2)(v) TNVAT Act: Madras HC upholds Single bench’s Order Quashing Assessment, Limits Revival of Assessment Post- SC Decision [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/250x150_2085767-export-of-goods-zero-rate-sale-tnvat-act-madras-high-court-vat-vat-act-taxscan.webp "Reversal of ITC u/s 19(2)(v) TNVAT Act: Madras HC upholds Single bench’s Order Quashing Assessment, Limits Revival of Assessment Post- SC Decision [Read Order]")
GST Liability on Construction of Mauritius Supreme Court: Madras HC Dismisses Writ as Premature, Directs to File Reply [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has dismissed as premature a writ petition which sought to quash a show cause notice (SCN) demanding Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) on the construction of the new Supreme...
![GST Liability on Construction of Mauritius Supreme Court: Madras HC Dismisses Writ as Premature, Directs to File Reply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085770-gst-liability-taxscan.webp "GST Liability on Construction of Mauritius Supreme Court: Madras HC Dismisses Writ as Premature, Directs to File Reply [Read Order]")
GST Payers Entitled to avail ITC for FYs 2017-18 to 2020-21 on GSTR-3B Filed on or before 30.11.2021: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has reasserted that registered taxpayers are entitled to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) for the financial years 2017-18 to 2020-21, provided their GSTR-3B returns were filed on...
![GST Payers Entitled to avail ITC for FYs 2017-18 to 2020-21 on GSTR-3B Filed on or before 30.11.2021: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085762-gstr3b-itc-taxscan.webp "GST Payers Entitled to avail ITC for FYs 2017-18 to 2020-21 on GSTR-3B Filed on or before 30.11.2021: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Disclosure of Additional Income in S. 153C Proceedings Does Not Automatically Prove Guilty of Concealment of Income: ITAT [Read Order]
The Cochin Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has ruled that disclosure of additional income in response to a notice issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, cannot...
![Disclosure of Additional Income in S. 153C Proceedings Does Not Automatically Prove Guilty of Concealment of Income: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085758-concealment-income-taxscan.webp "Disclosure of Additional Income in S. 153C Proceedings Does Not Automatically Prove Guilty of Concealment of Income: ITAT [Read Order]")
S. 54F Exemption cannot Be Denied for Non-Deposit in Capital Gain Account if Entire Sale Consideration already Invested in Plot: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961, cannot be denied merely because the assessee did not deposit the...
![S. 54F Exemption cannot Be Denied for Non-Deposit in Capital Gain Account if Entire Sale Consideration already Invested in Plot: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085751-capital-gain-exemption-taxscan.webp "S. 54F Exemption cannot Be Denied for Non-Deposit in Capital Gain Account if Entire Sale Consideration already Invested in Plot: ITAT [Read Order]")
Application of S. 115BBE without Linking to Proper Charging Provision u/s 68-69D is Not Valid: ITAT deletes Rs. 1cr Addition [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has struck down an addition of ₹1 crore made under Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO)...
![Application of S. 115BBE without Linking to Proper Charging Provision u/s 68-69D is Not Valid: ITAT deletes Rs. 1cr Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085746-income-tax-addition-taxscan.webp "Application of S. 115BBE without Linking to Proper Charging Provision u/s 68-69D is Not Valid: ITAT deletes Rs. 1cr Addition [Read Order]")
Income Tax Penalty cannot be levied on Addition based on Estimation: “Unsustainable”, says ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that the penalty under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, cannot be levied when the underlying addition is based purely...
![Income Tax Penalty cannot be levied on Addition based on Estimation: “Unsustainable”, says ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085741-income-tax-penalty-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Penalty cannot be levied on Addition based on Estimation: “Unsustainable”, says ITAT [Read Order]")
Madras HC Restores Hyundai-Mobis’ Appeal before CESTAT: Condones 145-Day Delay due to Employee’s Chickenpox Leave [Read Order]
The Madras High Court recently condoned a delay of 145 days in filing an appeal by Hyundai’s subsidiary Mobis India Limited (Mobis India) and restored their case before the Customs, Excise and...
![Madras HC Restores Hyundai-Mobis’ Appeal before CESTAT: Condones 145-Day Delay due to Employee’s Chickenpox Leave [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/11/500x300_2085696-madras-high-court-cestat-madras-hc-restores-hyundai-mobis-taxscan.webp "Madras HC Restores Hyundai-Mobis’ Appeal before CESTAT: Condones 145-Day Delay due to Employee’s Chickenpox Leave [Read Order]")