![Construction of Independent Residential Houses for Personal Use Not Taxable as ‘Residential Complex Service’: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/500x300_2078387-construction-independent-residential-houses-taxable-as-cestat-taxscan.webp "Construction of Independent Residential Houses for Personal Use Not Taxable as ‘Residential Complex Service’: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Construction of Independent Residential Houses for Personal Use Not Taxable as ‘Residential Complex Service’: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the construction of independent residential houses for...
![SEBI Extends Implementation Timeline for Margin Pledge/Re-Pledge Framework Following CDSL & NSDL Representations [Read Circular]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/250x150_2078245-sebi-cdsl-nsdl-representations-taxscan.webp "SEBI Extends Implementation Timeline for Margin Pledge/Re-Pledge Framework Following CDSL & NSDL Representations [Read Circular]")
![No Constitutional Violation in GST RCM u/s 17(2) and 17(3) of CGST Act on Security Services: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/250x150_2078306-constitutional-violation-gst-cgst-services-bombay-hc-taxscan.webp "No Constitutional Violation in GST RCM u/s 17(2) and 17(3) of CGST Act on Security Services: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Mere Assembly of Imported Components can make “e-Rickshaw”: CESTAT upholds Differential Customs Duty Demand, Penalty and Interest [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/250x150_2078370-mere-assembly-of-imported-components-imported-components-can-make-e-rickshaw-taxscan.webp "Mere Assembly of Imported Components can make “e-Rickshaw”: CESTAT upholds Differential Customs Duty Demand, Penalty and Interest [Read Order]")
![IGST-Total Taxable Value Mistake in filing April 2019 GSTR-3B: Patna HC allows to Rectify GSTR-3B on par with GSTR-1 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/250x150_2078269-2041639-gstn-advisory-auto-populated-liability-gstr-3b-become-non-editable-taxscan.webp "IGST-Total Taxable Value Mistake in filing April 2019 GSTR-3B: Patna HC allows to Rectify GSTR-3B on par with GSTR-1 [Read Order]")
IBC Proceedings are Not meant for recovery of money with respect to Solvent companies: NCLT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Tribunal(NCLT) has held that Insolvency Bankruptcy Code Proceedings are not to recover applicants dues. Dismissed application, as the...
![IBC Proceedings are Not meant for recovery of money with respect to Solvent companies: NCLT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/500x300_2078260-nclt-taxscan.webp "IBC Proceedings are Not meant for recovery of money with respect to Solvent companies: NCLT [Read Order]")
Receiving Gifts Before Wedding Date Cannot Be Treated as Ungenuine Without Proof: ITAT Deletes ₹4.31 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted an addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO), holding that gifts received before a wedding date cannot be treated as ...
![Receiving Gifts Before Wedding Date Cannot Be Treated as Ungenuine Without Proof: ITAT Deletes ₹4.31 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/500x300_2078331-receiving-gifts-before-wedding-date-wedding-gifts-taxscan.webp "Receiving Gifts Before Wedding Date Cannot Be Treated as Ungenuine Without Proof: ITAT Deletes ₹4.31 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition [Read Order]")
![Vintage Car Sale Liable to Capital Gains Tax if No Proof of Personal Use: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/500x300_2078259-capital-gains-tax-proof-of-personal-use-vintage-car-sale-taxscan.webp "Vintage Car Sale Liable to Capital Gains Tax if No Proof of Personal Use: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Export Incentives Can't Be Denied For Inadvertent Error: Karnataka HC Allows to Amend Shipping Bills [Read Order]
The Karnataka High Court held that export incentives cannot be denied for an inadvertent error in the shipping bill and allowed the benefit. The court issued a mandamus directing the respondents to...
![Export Incentives Cant Be Denied For Inadvertent Error: Karnataka HC Allows to Amend Shipping Bills [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/500x300_2078326-customs-igst-refund-igst-refund-to-exporter-higher-rate-of-duty-drawback-duty-drawback-duty-drawback-was-availed-madras-hc-taxscan.webp "Export Incentives Cant Be Denied For Inadvertent Error: Karnataka HC Allows to Amend Shipping Bills [Read Order]")
Disallowance of INR 17.95 Lakh Royalty Expenses: ITAT Deletes Addition Applying Consistency Principle [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) applying the consistency principle, deleted the disallowance of INR 17.95 lakh royalty expenses made by the Assessing Officer (AO).Travel...
![Disallowance of INR 17.95 Lakh Royalty Expenses: ITAT Deletes Addition Applying Consistency Principle [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/500x300_2078229-disallowance-inr-1795-lakh-royalty-expenses-itat-deletes-addition-applying-consistency-principle-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of INR 17.95 Lakh Royalty Expenses: ITAT Deletes Addition Applying Consistency Principle [Read Order]")
Seven-Year Delay in Filing Appeals Due to Trustee’s Health: Karnataka HC Dismisses Appeal as No Substantial Question of Law Arises [Read Order]
The High Court of Karnataka, in a case involving a seven-year delay in filing appeals due to the trustee’s health, dismissed the appeal, upholding the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) and ...
![Seven-Year Delay in Filing Appeals Due to Trustee’s Health: Karnataka HC Dismisses Appeal as No Substantial Question of Law Arises [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/500x300_2078226-law-arises-dismisses-appeal-karnataka-high-court-taxscan.webp "Seven-Year Delay in Filing Appeals Due to Trustee’s Health: Karnataka HC Dismisses Appeal as No Substantial Question of Law Arises [Read Order]")