Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

90-Day Delay in Filing Form 10AB for S.80G Approval: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT(E) Pending CBDT’s Decision on Condonation [Read Order]

The trust had meanwhile filed a condonation petition under section 119(2)(b) before the CBDT on 17.07.2025

Form10AB - ITAT - Taxscan
X

Form10AB - ITAT - Taxscan

The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) restores matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) [CIT(E)] pending Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT)’s decision on condonation in the case of trust, which faced a 90-day delay in filing Form 10AB for Section 80G of Income Tax Act,1961, approval.

Unico Charitable Trust,appellant-assessee,was a public charitable trust established on 13.06.2020 and engaged in charitable activities as per its Trust Deed. The trust had obtained provisional approval under section 80G of the Act through Form 10AC dated 28.02.2023, valid for assessment years 2023-24 to 2025-26.

As per section 80G(5)(iii), the trust was required to submit Form 10AB for regular approval either within six months of commencing its activities or at least six months before the expiry of the provisional registration, whichever was earlier. The due date for filing was September 2024, but the trust filed Form 10AB on 30.12.2024, resulting in a delay of 90 days.

Step by Step Guidance for Tax Audit & E-filing, Click Here

Due to this delay, the CIT(E) rejected the application filed in Form 10AB as not maintainable. Aggrieved by the rejection, the trust filed an appeal before the tribunal.

The assessee counsel stated that a petition for condonation of delay in filing Form 10AB was filed before the CBDT under section 119(2)(b) on 17.07.2025. It was requested that the matter be sent back to the CIT(E) to await the decision of the competent authority on the condonation application.

The Departmental counsel supported the CIT(E)’s order.

The two member bench comprising George George K (Vice President) and Amitabh Shukla (Accountant Member) heard both sides and noted that the assessee had applied to the competent authority under section 119(2)(b) for condonation of delay in filing Form 10AB.

Since the application was pending and directly affected the approval under section 80G, the tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(E) and directed a fresh order after the competent authority’s decision.

Accordingly the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscanpremium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

M/s. Unico Charitable Trust vs The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)
CITATION :  2025 TAXSCAN (ITAT) 1522Case Number :  ITA No.: 1360/CHNY/2025Date of Judgement :  13 August 2025Coram :  AMITABH SHUKLA, GEORGE GEORGE KCounsel of Appellant :  Ms. Parvatha VarthiniCounsel Of Respondent :  Ms. H. Kabila

Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019