Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Advance Received Falls Under Ambit of 'Consideration': AAR Rules on GST Liability [Read Order]

As per Schedule II of the CGST Act, works contract shall be treated as a supply of service. The applicant was concerned with the GST applicability on the advance payment.

Advance Received Falls Under Ambit of Consideration: AAR Rules on GST Liability [Read Order]
X

The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling at Ahmedabad decided a matter regarding Goods and Service Tax liability wherein it was held that the advance received by the applicant fell under the ambit of ‘consideration’. Also Read: Bar u/s 231 of IBC Not AutomaticGround to Reject Suit Challenging Sale Deed without Numbering of Plaint: MadrasHC The applicant is a...


The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling at Ahmedabad decided a matter regarding Goods and Service Tax liability wherein it was held that the advance received by the applicant fell under the ambit of ‘consideration’.

Also Read: Bar u/s 231 of IBC Not AutomaticGround to Reject Suit Challenging Sale Deed without Numbering of Plaint: MadrasHC

The applicant is a government contractor providing services related to Sewage Treatment Plant. They had received a contract for providing services related to storm water drainage, for newly developed areas falling under Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (AUDA). As per the terms of the tender, 10% of the contract amount is given as advance to the applicant. All payments made by AUDA towards execution are paid along with GST @ 18%.

The issue that the applicant was concerned with as the GST applicability on the advance payment. This advance is adjusted in the R.A. Bills. The counsel for the applicant submits that no GST is payable of the advance.

The adjudicating authority notes that the applicant is providing works contract services to AUDA. It was observed that the deposit made through an advance would qualify as ‘consideration’. It was held that as per Schedule II of the CGST Act, works contract shall be treated as a supply of service. Additionally, as per Section 13, the liability to pay tax on services shall arise at the time of supply.

Also Read: Improper Procedure forRe-determination of Transaction Value of Power Banks: CESTAT Notes Lack ofEvidence against Flipkart, Allows Appeal

The case of Re: S.P. Singla Constructions P. Ltd was referred to and it was held by the two member bench of CGST Members Sushma Vora and Vishal Malani that GST is liable to be paid on the advance payment received.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates
In Re: PC Snehal Construction Private Limited , 2026 TAXSCAN (AAR) 110 , ADVANCE RULING NO.GUJ/GAAR/R/2026/03 , 19 February 2026 , Shri Bhargav Desai, Shri Kannaiyalal Modi, Accountant
In Re: PC Snehal Construction Private Limited
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (AAR) 110Case Number :  ADVANCE RULING NO.GUJ/GAAR/R/2026/03Date of Judgement :  19 February 2026Counsel of Appellant :  Shri Bhargav Desai, Shri Kannaiyalal Modi, Accountant
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019