Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Britannia Biscuit Wholesale Dealer's Estimated Income Reduced to 1% from 1.5%: ITAT Reduces Income citing Earlier Years estimation [Read Order]

Observing the varying comparative percentages of profit in earlier years and to avoid affecting the provisions of Section 140 of the Act, the Tribunal reduced the estimated income to 1% from 1.5% as estimated by the AO.

Britannia Biscuit - Taxscan
X

Britannia Biscuit - Taxscan

The Cuttack Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal reduced the estimated income of the assessee to 1% from 1.5% as estimated by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to the varying comparative percentages of profit in earlier years.

Madan Lal Gupta (assessee), a wholesale dealer of Britannia Biscuits in the course of assessment, the assessee's books of accounts were rejected, and the AO estimated the income at 1.5% of the total turnover, although the AO had initially proposed treating the Net Profit (NP) at 5%.

The assessee had disclosed a net profit of 0.62% for the impugned assessment year. Aggrieved by the AO’s order, the assessee filed an appeal before the commissioner of the Income Tax (appeals)[CIT(A)]. The CIT(A) confirmed the estimation.

GST READY RECKONER: Complete Topic wise Circulars, Instructions & Guidelines, Click here

Aggrieved by the CIT(A)’s order, the assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The Counsel for the assessee submitted that a coordinate bench of the Tribunal, in the assessee's own case for the Assessment Year 2009-10, had estimated the income at 0.39%. The counsel prayed that the income disclosed at 0.62% be accepted.

The Single Member Bench, comprising George Mathan, (Judicial Member) noted that for A.Y. 2009-10, the tribunal had estimated the income at 0.39%, considering that the comparative profit percentages for the earlier years varied between 0.25% and 0.45%. The Tribunal further noted that for the current Assessment Year, the percentage of profit was admittedly 0.62%.

The tribunal also observed that the facts for A.Y. 2009-10 could not be applied to the current year, as applying the same would affect the provisions of Section 140 of the Act, which could lead to the assessed income going below the returned income.

In the interest of justice, the Tribunal directed that the income of the assessee be estimated at 1% against the 1.5% estimated by the AO. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Madan Lal Gupta Near Charampa College vs ITO
CITATION :  2025 TAXSCAN (ITAT) 1926Case Number :  ITA No.379/CTK/2025Date of Judgement :  23 September 2025Coram :  GEORGE MATHANCounsel of Appellant :  B.R. PandaCounsel Of Respondent :  Vijay Singh

Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019