Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Can Cloud Records Qualify as Books of Account under Income Tax Act 2025 if Loose Papers Did under ITA, 1961?

Loose papers were once treated as books of account under ITA 1961 when corroborated with evidence, and the same principle could extend to electronic and cloud records under ITA 2025?

Kavi Priya
Books of account Income Tax Act - Cloud records taxation India - Loose papers income tax law - taxscan
X

Traditionally, “books of account” meant ledgers, journals, and formal accounting records. Yet Indian tax law has never confined itself to such a narrow definition. For decades, tax authorities and courts have treated even loose slips of paper, diaries, and handwritten notes as books of account if they could be linked to undisclosed income.

Today, business record-keeping has moved to the cloud. Accounts are maintained on platforms like Tally Cloud, Zoho Books, or QuickBooks Online. This shift raises an important question: can electronic and cloud records be treated as books of account under the Income Tax Act, 2025 (ITA 2025), just as loose papers were under the earlier Income Tax Act, 1961 (ITA 1961)?

Your Ultimate Guide to India’s Latest Income Tax Laws - Click here

Loose Papers under ITA 1961

Under ITA 1961, survey and search operations often uncovered loose papers, notes, or rough calculations. The legal question was whether such documents could be treated as reliable evidence of income.

The law itself supported a wide definition:

  • Section 158B(b) defined “undisclosed income” broadly, covering not only assets found but also income “based on entry in books of account or other documents or transactions representing income.”
  • Section 158BB(1) clarified that undisclosed income could be computed not only from books of account but also from “such other materials” or “information” available to the Assessing Officer.

Several important rulings shaped the answer. In Lunkad Media and Entertainment Ltd. v. Union of India, the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that even loose papers containing financial entries could be treated as books of account if they were corroborated by independent evidence, such as bank statements.

In Commissioner of Income Tax v. T. R. Rangroopchand Chordia (Madras High Court, 2016), the court ruled that loose sheets seized during a search were “documents” under Section 132(4) of ITA 1961 and were admissible in tax proceedings, even if they lacked dates.

At the same time, the Supreme Court in cases relating to the Sahara and Birla groups stressed that loose papers had no independent evidentiary value unless supported by corroboration. The principle was clear: loose papers could not be dismissed outright, but they could not be the sole basis for additions either. They needed to be backed by other evidence.

In Conc Shade Construction Pvt.Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore, 2022), Excel files and digital records were seized from a director’s computer, which showed investments and expenses. The assessee argued that digital records should be treated like loose sheets and lacked credibility. However, the Tribunal rejected this view. It held that digital data fell within the meaning of “documents” under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act and thus, had evidentiary value, though corroboration was still required.

Search vs Survey

Before turning to ITA 2025, it is important to clarify the distinction between a search and a survey, because they involve different powers.

  • A search under Section 132 of ITA 1961 is a full-fledged raid, where officers can seize books, documents, assets, and even cash.
  • A survey under Section 133A of ITA 1961 (and now Section 253 of ITA 2025) is more limited. Officers can enter business premises, inspect records, and gather information, but they do not have the same wide powers of seizure.

In the Lunkad Media case, the assessee argued that the operation was actually a search and therefore the stricter provisions of Sections 153A to 153D should apply. The Madhya Pradesh High Court rejected this, holding that the action was only a survey. This distinction is important because the present debate, whether cloud data can qualify as books of account, arises under the law relating to surveys, not searches.

Section 253 of ITA 2025: A Clearer Legal Framework

The Income Tax Act, 2025 modernizes survey powers to explicitly include electronic records.

Section 253(1)(i), ITA 2025:

“An income-tax authority may require any proprietor, trustee, employee or other person… to provide the necessary technical and other assistance (including access code) to enable the inspection of such books of account or other documents, or information in electronic form or on a computer system.”

This provision corresponds to Section 133A, ITA 1961, which empowered officers to inspect books or documents at business premises.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Provision

ITA 1961 – Section 133A (Survey)

ITA 2025 – Section 253 (Survey)

Scope

Inspect books of account or other documents available at the business premises

Inspect books, documents, or information “in electronic form or on a computer system”

Access

No express mention of digital data

Explicitly requires assessees to provide technical help and access codes

Evidence

Loose papers, slips, diaries often contested but sometimes treated as books

Cloud data and digital records clearly within scope of inspection

Can Cloud Records Be Treated as Books of Account?

Drawing on past jurisprudence about loose papers and the current statutory framework, the answer is yes. Cloud records can qualify as books of account under ITA 2025. But, as with loose papers, there are conditions:

  1. Verification: Cloud data must be tested against external evidence such as bank transactions, GST returns, or invoices.
  2. Authenticity: Digital trails such as timestamps, audit logs, and version histories can establish the reliability of cloud records.
  3. Accessibility: The law requires taxpayers to provide passwords and technical assistance to allow inspection.
  4. Relevance: The data must relate to the business or professional activity and be useful for tax proceedings.

In other words, cloud records are not automatically decisive, but they cannot be ignored either.

Challenges in Practice

Despite clarity in the law, real-world issues remain:

  • Jurisdiction: If servers are outside India, how can access be enforced?
  • Data Integrity: Electronic records can be altered. Courts may need digital forensics.
  • Privacy: Should tax officers get full access to an account, or only specific folders?
  • Litigation: Just as loose papers sparked disputes in the past, cloud data will invite its own challenges.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates


Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019