Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

CBIC Circular Allowing Superintendents to Issue GST Summons Prima Facie Without Legal Authority: Rajasthan HC Grants Interim Stay [Read Order]

The Rajasthan High Court stays CBIC circular allowing Superintendents to issue GST summons, finding it prima facie issued without legal authority

Kavi Priya
Legal Authority - Rajasthan HC - Grants - taxscan
X

GST Summons

In a recent ruling, the Rajasthan High Court granted an interim stay on the operation of a CBIC circular that allowed Superintendents to issue GST summons, finding that it prima facie lacked legal authority under the GST law.

GST on Real Estate & Works Contracts – Your Ultimate Guide to GST in the Real Estate Sector! Click here

Mohit Kirana Store filed a writ petition challenging the circular dated 05.07.2017, arguing that the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) did not have the power to delegate the issuance of GST summons to Superintendents. The petitioner argued that under Section 2(91) of the CGST Act, 2017, only the Commissioner has the authority to delegate such powers, and therefore, the circular was issued without proper legal authority.

The revenue’s counsel argued that the circular was issued by the Commissioner and not by the CBIC, and so the delegation of power to Superintendents to issue summons under GST was valid. The revenue’s counsel argued that the delegation was necessary for effective administration under GST.

The petitioner’s counsel countered, arguing that the circular explicitly stated it was issued by the CBIC and not by the Commissioner, making the delegation invalid in law. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the CBIC had overstepped its authority under the GST framework.

A division bench led by Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Maneesh Sharma observed that the petitioner had made out a strong prima facie case, indicating that the circular may have been issued without proper legal authority. The court also observed that since a substantial legal question was involved, the matter required detailed examination at the final hearing stage.

The court rejected the revenue’s applications to vacate the earlier stay and made the interim stay absolute. The court directed that the matter be listed for final hearing in the coming weeks to decide the validity of the circular.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates


Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019