Club Providing Ad Display Space Doesn’t Qualify as Advertising Agency, May Attract BAS: CESTAT [Read Order]
CESTAT ruled Club allowing space for ad display is not an 'advertising agency' under Section 65(3), but falls under Business Auxiliary Service
![Club Providing Ad Display Space Doesn’t Qualify as Advertising Agency, May Attract BAS: CESTAT [Read Order] Club Providing Ad Display Space Doesn’t Qualify as Advertising Agency, May Attract BAS: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/17/2045970-ad-display-space-taxscan.webp)
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a club merely allowing space for advertisement display is not an “advertising agency” under Section 65(3) of the Finance Act, 1994 and such activity, if taxable, may fall under Business Auxiliary Services instead.
Calcutta Club Ltd., the appellant, is a members-only club incorporated as a public limited company. During the financial years 2008-09 to 2012-13, the club earned advertisement income from businesses that displayed banners during events or in club publications. A show cause notice was issued, and the adjudicating authority confirmed a demand of Rs. 2,49,342 under the category of “Advertising Agency Service,” holding that the club was liable to pay service tax on this income.
Also Read:CESTAT Holds Assessee must Pay Redemption Fine for Seized Goods Missing from their custody [Read Order]
The appellant’s counsel argued that it was not engaged in making, preparing, or displaying advertisements and did not act as an advertising agency. The club simply permitted businesses to display pre-prepared ads during internal member events and collected a fee or commission in return. They argued that its role was limited to providing space, not handling advertisement content or logistics.
GST READY RECKONER: Complete Topic wise Circulars, Instructions & Guidelines Click here
The appellant’s counsel referred to CBIC Circular No. 96/7/2007-ST dated 23rd August 2007, which clarified that merely canvassing advertisements for publication does not qualify as advertising agency service and instead falls under Business Auxiliary Services, if taxable. They also argued that their primary function was to serve club members, and the ad income was incidental.
Also Read:Service Tax Demand Can Be Based on Broadcaster Data If Cable Operator Suppresses Facts: CESTAT [Read Order]
The revenue countered that the club collected fees for displaying advertisements and, therefore, should be treated as providing advertisement services under Section 65(105)(e). They further argued that the club failed to register or pay service tax, and the liability came to light only after departmental verification.
The two-member bench comprising R. Muralidhar (Judicial Member) and K. Anpazhakan (Technical Member) observed that to be classified as an advertising agency, a person must be involved in the making, preparation, display, or exhibition of advertisements. Since the club did not perform these functions and only allowed advertisers to place ads during member events, it did not fall under the definition of an advertising agency.
Complete Ready to Use PDFs of 200+ Agreements Click here
The tribunal also referred to the CBIC circular, which supported the appellant’s position. The tribunal explained that such activities do not attract tax under “Advertising Agency Services” and any potential liability would arise, if at all, under Business Auxiliary Services, a category not invoked in the show cause notice. The tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 2,49,342 under advertising agency service.
Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscanpremium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates