Deductions Under Income Tax: Computation Methods, Regime Comparison, and Procedural Changes in New Income Tax Act [Old vs New Income Tax]

The Indian income tax framework has undergone significant transformations, particularly with the introduction of an optional new tax regime, fundamentally altering how taxpayers approach their financial planning and tax obligations. Deductions play a pivotal role in reducing the taxable income of individuals and entities, thereby influencing their net tax liability.

Historically, the Income Tax Act, 1961, has provided a plethora of deductions aimed at incentivizing savings, investments, and specific economic activities. However, the advent of the new tax regime has presented taxpayers with a critical choice: to continue with the traditional, deduction-heavy regime or opt for a simplified structure with lower tax rates but fewer exemptions and deductions.

This article aims to meticulously analyse the computation methods for deductions, compare the two prevailing tax regimes, and highlight the procedural changes and implications for assesses.

Deductions under the Traditional Tax Regime (Old Regime):

The old tax regime, which remains the default option for taxpayers who do not opt for the new regime, is built on the philosophy of encouraging specific financial behaviours through tax incentives. It allows for a wide array of deductions from the Gross Total Income (GTI) to arrive at the Net Taxable Income.

The Supreme Court in M/s Synco Industries Ltd vs Assessing Officer, Income Tax, Mumbai & Anr. (2008 AIR SCW 2321) clarified that "total income" as defined by Section 80B(5) is the total income computed under the provisions of the Act, but before making any deductions under Chapter VI-A.

A. Chapter VI-A Deductions: Fostering Savings and Welfare:

Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is a cornerstone of tax planning for individual taxpayers and Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs). It allows for deductions from Gross Total Income for various investments, expenses, and contributions. Key sections include:

· Section 80C: This is perhaps the most widely utilized deduction, allowing a deduction of up to INR 1,50,000 for investments in specified instruments such as Public Provident Fund (PPF), Employees' Provident Fund (EPF), Equity Linked Savings Schemes (ELSS), life insurance premiums, principal repayment of home loans, and children's tuition fees.

· Section 80D: This section provides deductions for health insurance premiums paid for self, spouse,dependent children, and parents. The limits vary based on the age of the insured individuals.

· Section 80E: Allows for deduction of interest paid on education loans taken for higher education of self, spouse, or children, without any upper limit on the amount of interest.

· Section 80G: Provides deductions for donations made to approved charitable institutions and funds, with varying limits (50% or 100%) depending on the recipient organization.

· Section 80TTA/80TTB: Section 80TTA allows a deduction of up to INR 10,000 for interest earned on savings bank accounts for individuals and HUFs. Section 80TTB, introduced for senior citizens, allows a higher deduction of up to INR 50,000 for interest income from savings accounts and fixed deposits.

The computation method under this regime involves first calculating the Gross Total Income, from which these Chapter VI-A deductions are subtracted to arrive at the Total Taxable Income. This structured approach under the old regime has historically incentivized specific investments and economic activities, aligning individual financial planning with national development goals. The detailed provisions under Chapter VI-A provided a robust framework for targeted tax benefits, promoting diverse sectors and encouraging responsible financial behaviour among taxpayers.

B. Business and Professional Deductions: Promoting Economic Growth

Beyond individual savings, the old regime also offers significant profit-linked deductions to businesses and professionals, particularly those engaged in promoting economic growth, exports, and development in specific regions. Key sections include:

· Section 80-IA: Provides deductions for profits and gains from industrial undertakings engaged in infrastructure development, power generation, and certain other specified businesses.

· Section 80-IB: Offers deductions for profits from certain industrial undertakings, hotels, and scientific research and development companies.

· Section 80-IC/80-IE: Special provisions for undertakings established in specific backward states like Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Uttaranchal, and the North-Eastern States, to promote industrialization in these regions.

· Section 80-ID: Grants deductions for profits derived from the business of hotels located in specified backward areas.

· Section 80-JJAA: Allows a deduction for additional employee cost incurred by an employer, incentivizing job creation.

These deductions are typically computed as a percentage of the profits derived from the eligible business or undertaking, subject to various conditions and time limits. Such provisions have been instrumental in fostering industrialization, regional development, and export-oriented growth. The old regime, with its extensive list of deductions, has served as a powerful tool for the government to direct investments and stimulate economic activity in desired sectors, thereby contributing significantly to the nation's overall economic development.

Deductions under the New Tax Regime:

The new regime offers lower tax rates with minimal deductions, simplifying compliance for taxpayers who prefer straightforward taxation over investment-linked planning. This aims to simplify compliance, reduce the need for complex tax planning, and potentially encourage greater participation in the tax system.

Chapter VIII of the New Income Tax Act 2025 (Sections 122-154) corresponds to Chapter VI-A (Sections 80A-80U) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This chapter contains all provisions relating to deductions from Gross Total Income to arrive at Total Income. The new Act has significantly simplified the presentation while maintaining complete substantive continuity.

A. Key Sections of the New Income Tax Act includes:

· Section 122: Corresponding to 80A of the 1961 Act and provides Overview provision stating all deductions under sections 123-154 are allowed from Gross Total Income; no deduction allowed against special rate income or presumptive income, and deductions must be claimed in prescribed order.

· Section 123: Corresponding to 80C of the 1961 Act and Allows deduction up to ₹1,50,000 for specified investments like LIC, PPF, EPF, NSC, ELSS, tuition fees, home loan principal, etc., with all eligible items now consolidated in Schedule XV for easy reference.

· Section 127: Corresponding to 80D of the 1961 Act and allowing Health insurance premium deduction of ₹25,000 (₹50,000 for senior citizens) for self/family, additional ₹25,000/₹50,000 for parents, plus ₹5,000 for preventive health checkup within limits.

· Section 131: Corresponding to 80E of the 1961 Act and Interest on education loan fully deductible with no upper limit for 8 consecutive years; loan must be for higher education of self, spouse, children, or student for whom individual is guardian.

· Section 136: Corresponding to 80G of the 1961 Act and Donations to specified funds/charities deductible at 50% or 100% rates, with or without 10% GTI limit depending on category; PM CARES, National Defence Fund get 100% without limit, while general charities have restrictions.

· Section 138: Corresponding to 80TTA of the 1961 Act and Deduction up to ₹10,000 for savings account interest for individuals/HUF below 60 years; applicable to interest from banks, co-operative societies, and post offices.

· Section 139: Corresponding to 80TTB of the 1961 Act and Deduction up to ₹50,000 for senior citizens (60+ years) on all deposit interest including savings, fixed deposits, recurring deposits from banks and post offices; cannot claim both Section 138 and 139.

The new regime, therefore, aims to simplify compliance and reduce litigation arising from complex deduction claims, offering a straightforward approach to taxation. This shift represents a move towards a cleaner tax code, where the focus is less on incentivizing specific behaviours through tax breaks and more on a lower overall tax burden.

Regime Comparison: Strategic Decision-Making for Assessees

The existence of two parallel tax regimes necessitates a careful and strategic decision-making process for every assessee. The choice between the old and new regimes is not universal; it depends heavily on individual financial circumstances, income levels, and investment patterns.

Quantitative Analysis:

For taxpayers with significant investments in instruments eligible for Section 80C, substantial health insurance premiums (Section 80D), education loan interest (Section 80E), or a large housing loan interest component (Section 24(b)), the old regime often proves more beneficial.

The aggregate tax savings from these deductions can outweigh the benefit of lower tax rates offered by the new regime. Conversely, individuals who make minimal investments, do not have a housing loan, or do not claim many exemptions will likely find the new regime more attractive due to its lower tax rates and simplified compliance.

Qualitative Factors:

Beyond mere quantitative calculations, qualitative factors also play a crucial role. The new regime offers ease of compliance, as taxpayers are relieved from the burden of maintaining proofs for various deductions. This can be particularly appealing to younger taxpayers or those who prefer simplicity over complex tax planning.

However, the old regime, by incentivizing savings and investments, implicitly encourages long-term financial planning and wealth creation. The choice between regimes requires a careful, personalized assessment, considering not just immediate tax savings but also long-term financial goals, risk appetite, and the desire for simplicity versus optimized tax benefits.

Procedural Changes and Compliance Implications:

The introduction of the new tax regime has brought about specific procedural requirements for opting in and out, which taxpayers must meticulously follow to ensure compliance.

For salaried individuals, the choice between the old and new regimes can be made annually at the time of filing their Income Tax Return (ITR). They can also inform their employer at the beginning of the financial year to ensure correct Tax Deducted at Source (TDS). However, for individuals with business or professional income, the procedure is more stringent. They must opt for the new regime before the due date of filing their ITR for a particular assessment year.

Once they opt out of the new regime, they can only opt back in once in their lifetime, making the decision irreversible for a significant period. This distinction underscores the government's intent to provide flexibility to salaried individuals while encouraging a more stable choice for business entities.

The simplified nature of the new regime, by eliminating numerous deductions and exemptions, is expected to reduce the scope for disputes and scrutiny related to the validity of deduction claims. Conversely, taxpayers continuing with the old regime must maintain meticulous records and proofs for all claimed deductions to withstand potential scrutiny from the tax authorities. The importance of accurate record-keeping and adherence to procedural requirements cannot be overstated.

Navigating the Dual Tax Regime:

The co-existence of the old and new income tax regimes presents a unique challenge and opportunity for Indian taxpayers. The old regime, with its comprehensive suite of deductions, continues to offer significant tax-saving potential for those with substantial investments, expenditures, and specific business incomes.

It reflects a policy approach that uses tax incentives to guide economic and social behaviour. The new regime, on the other hand, embodies a move towards simplification and lower headline tax rates, albeit at the cost of most deductions.

Complete Supreme Court Judgment on GST from 2017 to 2024 with Free E-Book Access, Click here

The decision to opt for either regime requires a meticulous calculation and careful financial planning. Taxpayers must assess their individual income levels, existing investment portfolios, eligible expenditures, and future financial goals to determine which regime yields a lower tax liability. For individuals with minimal investments and deductions, the new regime might prove more beneficial due to its lower tax rates.

Thus, the evolving nature of tax laws necessitates continuous awareness and adaptation to make informed decisions, ensuring optimal tax efficiency and compliance.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates