Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Depreciation on Goodwill Arising from Amalgamation Allowed in Book Profits: ITAT Rules in Favour of S.C. Johnson Pvt. Ltd. [Read Order]

The Tribunal reinforced that book profit adjustments must align with judicially approved accounting methods. The decision shields amalgamated entities from arbitrary disallowances and underscores the legitimacy of depreciation on goodwill in tax computations

Depreciation on Goodwill Arising
X

Depreciation on Goodwill Arising

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, has upheld a corporate taxpayer’s accounting treatment of goodwill arising out of amalgamation, ruling that amortization of goodwill is allowed while computing book profits under Section115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, S.C. Johnson Pvt. Ltd., following amalgamation of its subsidiaries Roshni Appliances Pvt. Ltd. and KAPL under a scheme approved by the Delhi High Court, had recognized goodwill in its books using the purchase method. The goodwill, amounting to over ₹538 crores, was amortized over five years, and one-fifth of the amount was claimed in the computation of book profits.

The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed this claim, applying the pooling of interest method prescribed under Accounting Standard 14, and made additions exceeding ₹100 crores to book profits for Assessment Years (AY) 2007-08 and 2008-09.

Appearing through K. M. Gupta and Shruti Khimta, the appellant argued that its accounting treatment was consistent with the High Court–approved scheme of amalgamation and supported by its statutory auditors. It was submitted that under either pooling of interest or purchase method, the financial effect would be revenue-neutral, and disallowance of depreciation on goodwill was unwarranted.

Understanding Common Mode of Tax Evasion with Practical Scenarios, Click Here

The appellant relied on the Mumbai Tribunal’s decision in Toyo Engineering India Ltd (2008). to argue that depreciation on goodwill is permissible.

Appearing for the Revenue Authorities, Mahesh Kumar, contended that the pooling of interest method was mandatory under Accounting Standard 14 in the given circumstances and that the AO was within his powers to recompute book profits accordingly. It was argued that the adjustment made by the AO was justified to prevent an inflated claim of amortization.

The bench of Judicial Member, Anubhav Sharma and Accountant Member, Manish Agarwal ruled in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal observed that under either accounting method, the ultimate financial results would be similar, and hence the assessee’s claim could not be disallowed.

The Tribunal noted that the Delhi High Court had approved the amalgamation scheme recognizing the purchase method, the company’s audited balance sheet disclosures, and the auditors’ notes supporting the purchase method.

Accordingly, the ITAT directed deletion of the additions made to book profits, holding that amortization of goodwill was allowable under Section 115JB.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

S. C. Johnson Pvt. Ltd vs DCIT
CITATION :  2025 TAXSCAN (ITAT) 1648Case Number :  ITA No.1850/Del/2019Date of Judgement :  28 August 2025Coram :  SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWALCounsel of Appellant :  Shri K. M. Gupta, Ms. Shruti KhimtaCounsel Of Respondent :  Shri Mahesh Kumar

Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019