Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

DGFT Policy vs Customs Action: Delhi HC Directs Strict Implementation of Minimum Import Price on Soda Ash [Read Order]

The Court warned that any Commissionerate found permitting imports in violation of the MIP would be liable for stringent action in accordance with law.

Soda Ash - Taxscan
X

Soda Ash - Taxscan

The Delhi High Court has directed all Customs authorities to ensure the strict implementation of the Minimum Import Price (MIP) on Soda Ash, warning of stringent action for any violations.

Complete Blueprint for Preparing Project Reports, click here

The Alkali Manufacturers Association of India (AMAI), the petitioner, representing the interest of domestic alkali industries, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking enforcement of Notification No. 46/2024-25, which imposed an MIP of Rs. 20,108 per metric ton on Soda Ash.

The petitioner's grievance was that the Customs Department was permitting imports of Soda Ash at prices below the MIP, thereby adversely impacting the domestic industry. The authorities, including the Customs Department and the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), submitted that the MIP was being strictly implemented for all imports where the bills of entry or bills of lading were issued after the notification's date.

GST READY RECKONER: Complete Topic wise Circulars, Instructions & Guidelines Click here

It was explained that the alleged exceptions cited by the petitioner pertained to imports where the shipping documents pre-dated the MIP notification, and thus, were legally exempt. The DGFT also pointed to an Office Memorandum it had issued to field formations to ensure the policy's implementation.

The Division Bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Shail Jain noted that the authorities had already taken steps to enforce the policy. Accepting the stand of the authorities that the MIP is being enforced as per the date of the bill of lading, the Court found no deliberate violation of the policy.

Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition, but not before issuing clear directions to all Customs authorities across various ports to implement the MIP notifications "strictly in letter and spirit". The Court warned that any Commissionerate found permitting imports in violation of the MIP would be liable for stringent action in accordance with law.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

ALKALI MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
CITATION :  2025 TAXSCAN (HC) 2096Case Number :  W.P.(C) 11521/2025 & CM APPL. 47161/2025Date of Judgement :  9 October 2025Coram :  PRATHIBA M. SINGH and SHAIL JAINCounsel of Appellant :  Niyati Kohli, Rishabh Parikh, Pratham Vir AgarwalCounsel Of Respondent :  Shiva Lakshmi, Vivek Nagar, Madhav Bajaj

Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019