Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Disposing Multiple Income Tax Appeals by Common Order with Single DIN Valid: Kerala HC Directs Rectification of Cause Title Error [Read Order]

The Court stated that the petitioner's statutory right to file separate appeals for each assessment year must be protected, and the presence of a single DIN cannot be used as a ground for rejection

Kerala High Court ruling - income tax appeals - common order validity
X

The Kerala High Court ruled that the disposal of multiple income tax appeals by a common order with a single DIN is legally valid, but directed rectification of the cause title error and ensured separate appeals wouldn't be rejected solely on this ground.

The petitioner, Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment, challenged a common appellate order passed by the First Appellate Authority under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This order disposed of seven separate appeals filed against assessment orders for multiple assessment years (2012-13 to 2023-24), all concerning the benefit of Section 11 of the Income Tax Act. The petitioner contended that the common order carrying a single DIN and a cause title referring to a different case would cause difficulties in filing further appeals before the Income Tax Tribunal.

Stay Ahead with Expert Tax Insights – 2025 Edition

The Income Tax Department defended the common order, arguing that since all appeals involved identical legal issues, the authority rightly disposed of them together after taking the 2012-13 appeal as the lead case. The Department maintained there was no legal prohibition against such consolidated disposal when common issues were involved.

The Court, after examining Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, held that there is no specific bar against disposing of multiple appeals by a common order when identical issues are involved. It found that the petitioner suffered no prejudice from the consolidated disposal since the legal questions were the same across all appeals. However, the Court acknowledged that the single DIN in the common order could potentially create practical difficulties for the petitioner in filing separate statutory appeals.

A single bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A held that the appellate authority (4th respondent) must suo motu rectify the cause title error within two weeks. If the petitioner files separate appeals against the common order, the Income Tax Tribunal must accept them and not reject them solely because the impugned order carries a single DIN

The Court stated that the petitioner's statutory right to file separate appeals for each assessment year must be protected, and the presence of a single DIN cannot be used as a ground for rejection. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, balancing the validity of the common order with the protection of the petitioner's appellate rights.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

KERALA STATE COUNCIL vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)
CITATION :  2025 TAXSCAN (HC) 2004Case Number :  WP(C) NO. 35152 OF 2025Date of Judgement :  23 September 2025Coram :  ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.Counsel of Appellant :  BINISHA BABYCounsel Of Respondent :  JOSE JOSEPH

Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019