Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Double Taxation on GSTR-3B Delay Unsustainable: Madras HC Quashes Duplicate GST Interest Order [Read Order]

It was observed that there was a clear duplication of proceedings, which led to double taxation

Double Taxation on GSTR-3B Delay Unsustainable: Madras HC Quashes Duplicate GST Interest Order [Read Order]
X

The Madras High Court has quashed a duplicate gst order passed by the respondent against the petitioner, holding that double taxation on a delay in filing GSTR-3B is unsustainable. The brief facts are that, on Sri Velavan Fireworks, the petitioner, the proceedings were initiated. An order dated 26.08.2022 was passed imposing interest and penalty for the delay in filing the return...


The Madras High Court has quashed a duplicate gst order passed by the respondent against the petitioner, holding that double taxation on a delay in filing GSTR-3B is unsustainable.

The brief facts are that, on Sri Velavan Fireworks, the petitioner, the proceedings were initiated. An order dated 26.08.2022 was passed imposing interest and penalty for the delay in filing the return in GSTR3B.

For the delay period, April 2020 to March 2021, the interest was quantified as a sum of Rs. 71,963/- and the said amount was also duly paid by the petitioner.

However, once again, the respondent passed the impugned order on 06.01.2023 for the very same issue and very same period, whereby the interest was quantified as a sum of Rs.68,025/-.

It was contended that the said demand leads to double taxation and the same is not sustainable in law.

The bench of Justice Krishnan Ramasamy observed that two different orders were passed by two different Authorities for imposing delay in filing the GSTR-3B returns pertaining to the very same period, for April 2020 to March 2021. It was further observed that there was a clear duplication of proceedings, which led to double taxation.

Read more:Employer vs Employee PF/ESI Contributions Treatment under Income Tax:Supreme Court to Resolve Deduction Issue

It was held that, “When such being the case, as rightly contended by the petitioner, the impugned order passed by the respondent is not sustainable in law and hence, the same is liable to be quashed.”

Thus the writ petition was allowed.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscanpremium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates


Velavan Fireworks vs The commercial Tax Officer , 2026 TAXSCAN (HC) 257 , W.P.(MD)No.1566 of 2026 , 22 January 2026 , Sudalai Muthu N , R.Suresh Kumar, AGP
Velavan Fireworks vs The commercial Tax Officer
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (HC) 257Case Number :  W.P.(MD)No.1566 of 2026Date of Judgement :  22 January 2026Coram :  JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYCounsel of Appellant :  Sudalai Muthu NCounsel Of Respondent :  R.Suresh Kumar, AGP
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019