Drying And Roasting Are ‘Diametrically Different’ Processes: Allahabad HC Rules Roasted Areca Nuts Classifiable As Roasted, Not Dried [Read Order]

Rawder Petroleum Pvt Ltd had imported roasted areca nuts from Indonesia after obtaining an advance ruling from the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (CAAR), which had classified them under the tariff entry for roasted nuts. Relying on this ruling, the petitioner placed orders, and the goods arrived at ICD Panki, Kanpur in November 2024.

3000 Illustrations, Case Studies & Examples for Ind-AS & IFRS, Click Here

Customs disputed the classification and argued that the goods were dried areca nuts falling under a different tariff entry. The department relied on test reports of the Central Revenue Control Laboratory (CRCL), which showed higher moisture content and described the nuts as dried and unfit for consumption.

The petitioner’s counsel argued that reports from Fare Labs, obtained within the prescribed time, clearly showed lower moisture content and confirmed the goods were roasted. They further argued that samples had been taken without following prescribed guidelines and without the importer’s presence, which made the department’s reports unreliable.

The department’s counsel argued that CAAR had wrongly relied only on process-flow details without laboratory verification and that roasted nuts, as claimed by the importer, did not show the physical signs of roasting such as charring. They argued that classification under the dried nuts category was proper and consistent with earlier case law.

Affective Ways Of Tax Planning for HUF, Partnership Firm and Will - Click Here

The Division Bench comprising Justice Rajan Roy and Justice Om Prakash Shukla observed that advance rulings are meant to provide certainty and cannot be lightly set aside. The court explained that roasting involves severe heat treatment, distinct from the mild heat treatment or drying processes covered under Chapter 8 of the tariff schedule.

It pointed out that the earliest test report from Fare Labs, prepared within the prescribed five days, showed the nuts were roasted, while later CRCL reports suffered from procedural lapses.

The court held that roasted areca nuts were rightly classifiable under the tariff entry for roasted nuts, and that Customs had acted improperly by disregarding valid reports and seizing the goods.

The court quashed the seizure memo and directed release of the imported nuts, subject to Gamma Irradiation treatment due to the time elapsed since import. The writ petition was allowed, and the connected Customs appeals filed by the department were dismissed.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates