Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

GST Amount Collected allegedly Misappropriated: P&H HC orders Authorities to Examine Complaint [Read Order]

As the petitioner's representation was already pending before the concerned authority and directed the authority to examine the grievance

GST Amount Collected allegedly Misappropriated: P&H HC orders Authorities to Examine Complaint [Read Order]
X

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the authorities to examine a taxpayer’s complaint alleging cheating, forgery, fraudulent manipulation of GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) records and misappropriation of GST amounts collected from him. Rajesh Kumar filed a petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking action against a private respondent accused of...


The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the authorities to examine a taxpayer’s complaint alleging cheating, forgery, fraudulent manipulation of GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) records and misappropriation of GST amounts collected from him.

Rajesh Kumar filed a petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking action against a private respondent accused of committing offences including cheating, forgery, falsification of records, fraudulent manipulation of GST records and criminal misappropriation of GST amounts allegedly collected from the petitioner.

According to the petitioner, despite collection of GST from him, the amount was allegedly not properly accounted for, resulting in a grievance that warranted investigation by the authorities.

The petitioner approached the Court contending that he had already submitted a detailed representation dated 6 November 2025 before the concerned authority highlighting the alleged irregularities.

However, no decision had been taken on the representation. Thus, he opted to file a petition before the court.

Justice Surya Partap Singh observed that as the petitioner's representation was already pending before the concerned authority and directed the authority to examine the issue rather than undertake a factual determination itself in writ proceedings.

Accordingly, the High Court disposed of the petition with a direction to the concerned respondent authority to decide the petitioner’s representation by passing a speaking order within one month from the date of receipt of the Court’s order without going into the merits.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Rajesh Kumar vs State of Punjab and others , 2026 TAXSCAN (HC) 779 , CRM-M No.32467 of 2026 (O&M) , 2 June 2026 , Mr. Paras Jagga , Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal
Rajesh Kumar vs State of Punjab and others
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (HC) 779Case Number :  CRM-M No.32467 of 2026 (O&M)Date of Judgement :  2 June 2026Coram :  HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGHCounsel of Appellant :  Mr. Paras JaggaCounsel Of Respondent :  Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019