Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

GST Exemption on Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Oils with Petroleum Products: Madras HC directs reconsideration of Claim [Read Order]

The High Court was of the view that an opportunity can be granted to the petitioner even though the petitioner had filed a reply to the show cause notice.

GST Exemption on Minimum Quantity of Lubricant Oils with Petroleum Products: Madras HC directs reconsideration of Claim [Read Order]
X

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed reconsideration of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) exemption claim as there was only a minimum quantity of lubricant oils with petroleum products. Also Read: GSTR-1 & GSTR-3B MismatchLater Rectified: Karnataka HC Quashes Ex Parte GST Demand Order The counsel for the petitioner, I. Romeo Roy Alfred, claims that they...


The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed reconsideration of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) exemption claim as there was only a minimum quantity of lubricant oils with petroleum products.

Also Read: GSTR-1 & GSTR-3B MismatchLater Rectified: Karnataka HC Quashes Ex Parte GST Demand Order

The counsel for the petitioner, I. Romeo Roy Alfred, claims that they are traders of exempt goods (petroleum products) and only a certain minimal quantity of products such as rubber, lubricant, oils come within the GST regime.

The Additional Government Pleader, R. Suresh Kumar, submitted that it is duty of the assessee to prove before the Authority that the goods in question are exempted and in the absence of any documentary evidence in support of the claim, the assessment order under Section 73 of theTNGST Act dated 26.12.2025 had been passed.

It is to be noted that the petitioner’s total turnover was reported as an exempted turnover, but was not accepted as the order was passed.

Madras High Court was of the view that an opportunity can be granted to the petitioner even though the petitioner had filed a reply to the show cause notice. The High Court agreed with the counsel that only minimal and negligible amount comes within the lubricant oil etc. that is within the GST regime. The bench observed that the order was passed only because no supporting documents were filed.

Also Read: Allahabad  HC Directs Taxpayersto Approach Newly Constituted Appellate Tribunal for Pending Cases

Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy gave two weeks to the petitioner to file all documents in support of their claim of exemption, along with their additional reply. Thereafter, Madras High Court finally directed the Deputy Commissioner to decide the matter afresh. The order was set aside accordingly.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Sri Pavithra Agencies vs The Deputy Commissioner(GST Appeal) , 2026 TAXSCAN (HC) 576 , W.P(MD)No.8786 of 2026 , 1 April 2026 , Mr.I.Romeo Roy Alfred , Mr.R.Suresh Kumar
Sri Pavithra Agencies vs The Deputy Commissioner(GST Appeal)
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (HC) 576Case Number :  W.P(MD)No.8786 of 2026Date of Judgement :  1 April 2026Coram :  D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHYCounsel of Appellant :  Mr.I.Romeo Roy AlfredCounsel Of Respondent :  Mr.R.Suresh Kumar
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019