Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

GST Facilitation Operator Diverts Client’s ₹1.29 Crore Entrusted to Clear GST Dues: Orissa HC denies Pre-arrest Bail [Read Order]

The Court dismissed the anticipatory bail plea, vacated the interim protection, and held that there was sufficient prima facie evidence to justify custodial interrogation

GST Facilitation Operator Diverts Client’s ₹1.29 Crore Entrusted to Clear GST Dues: Orissa HC denies Pre-arrest Bail [Read Order]
X

The Court has refused to grant pre-arrest bail to an operator of a GST (Goods and Services Tax) facilitation centre who is accused of diverting over ₹1.29 crore meant for payment towards the GST dues of a client firm. The petitioner, Balidi @ Ballidi Chandra Sekhar had approached the Court seeking anticipatory bail in connection with G.R. Case No. 20 of 2025 pending...


The Court has refused to grant pre-arrest bail to an operator of a GST (Goods and Services Tax) facilitation centre who is accused of diverting over ₹1.29 crore meant for payment towards the GST dues of a client firm.

The petitioner, Balidi @ Ballidi Chandra Sekhar had approached the Court seeking anticipatory bail in connection with G.R. Case No. 20 of 2025 pending before the learned S.D.J.M., Umerkote, arising out of Umerkote P.S. Case No. 09 of 2025, alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, and 506 of the IPC read with Section 66(C) of the Information Technology Act.

GST on Real Estate & Works Contracts – Your Ultimate Guide to GST in the Real Estate Sector! Click here 

According to the prosecution, the petitioner, who was running a GST facilitation centre, allegedly misused his privileged access by diverting funds entrusted to him for clearing the informant’s statutory GST liabilities, instead transferring the amount to his own account as well as to the account of his mother.

While the petitioner’s counsel contested the exact quantum of the alleged defalcation, the State as well as the counsel for the informant strongly opposed the bail plea, pointing to documentary evidence from the GSTauthorities highlighting non-payment of dues for the period between April 2020 and March 2021.

The Court, considering the allegations, observed the wider ramifications of such financial misconduct on the tax administration system and cited the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Aditya Sarda to reiterate that economic offences require strict scrutiny.

The Court dismissed the application for anticipatory bail, rescinding the previous temporary protection, and denied to extend the advantage of pre-arrest bail, noting that there was enough evidence in the record to substantiate the claims prima facie.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Balidi vs Ballidi vs State of Odisha , 2025 TAXSCAN (HC) 1222 , ABLAPL No. 762 of 2025 , 18 June 2025 , Mr. A. Mishra , Mr. S. Panigrahi
Balidi vs Ballidi vs State of Odisha
CITATION :  2025 TAXSCAN (HC) 1222Case Number :  ABLAPL No. 762 of 2025Date of Judgement :  18 June 2025Coram :  V. NARASINGHCounsel of Appellant :  Mr. A. MishraCounsel Of Respondent :  Mr. S. Panigrahi
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019