GST ITC availed without actual movement of Goods: Chhattisgarh HC Grants Bail to accused on Rs. 1L Bond [Read Order]

The Chhattisgarh High Court recently granted regular bail to those accused of orchestrating a fraudulent Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) under Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) considering the custodial time.

The allegations against the petitioner, Anil Singh, was that he utilized non-existent transactions and "bogus billing" to claim tax benefits without any actual movement of goods.

The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) flagged M/s Ramdoot Enterprises for suspicious dealings with suspended or fictitious entities. Investigative leads pointed toward Singh, who allegedly operated two firms, M/s Yuvraj Trading and M/s Sonam Sales.

GST authorities claimed these businesses functioned as conduits for paper-only transactions, violating specific provisions underSection 132 of the GST Act. Also, the state argued that the accused bypassed the physical supply chain entirely, using fake invoices to siphon revenue from the government.

During the proceedings, counsel for the applicant argued that the prosecution's narrative relied heavily on third-party records rather than direct, incriminating evidence recovered from the accused himself.

The defense/ accused stated that because the maximum sentence for such an offense is five years, the legal standard of “bail is the rule and jail is the exception” should apply.

Furthermore, they pointed out that the investigation was largely complete, statements had been taken and searches conducted. Therefore further custodial interrogation is not necessary.

Conversely, the prosecution said that the accused was a central figure in a sophisticated conspiracy. They described a network where fake invoices were circulated through informal channels like WhatsApp, conspicuously lacking the e-way bills or transport documentation required for genuine trade.

They argued that releasing the applicant could lead to the tampering of evidence or hinder the discovery of the fraudulent chain.

After reviewing the arguments presented, the High Court focused on the nature of the evidence and the duration of the accused's stay in custody since mid-January 2026.

The Court observed that because the case is built on documents already in the possession of investigators, the risk of the accused interfering with the process was diminished.

While the Court did not rule on the ultimate guilt or innocence of the applicant, it allowed the bail application, ordering Singh’s release upon the submission of a ₹1,00,000 personal bond and a solvent surety.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates