Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Himachal Pradesh HC Sets Aside GST Order Passed Without Personal Hearing, Additional Advocate General Admits Dept’s Action Unsustainable [Read Order]

The court allowed the petition and set aside impugned order with a direction that the petitioner be granted a proper personal hearing.

Himachal Pradesh HC Sets Aside GST Order Passed Without Personal Hearing, Additional Advocate General Admits Dept’s Action Unsustainable [Read Order]
X

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has quashed a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) order that was issued without complying with the mandatory requirement of granting a personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2019. Chander Mukhi Resorts Private Limited approached the High Court challenging the summary of a show cause notice dated 02.12.2024...


The Himachal Pradesh High Court has quashed a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) order that was issued without complying with the mandatory requirement of granting a personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2019.

Chander Mukhi Resorts Private Limited approached the High Court challenging the summary of a show cause notice dated 02.12.2024 and the consequential summary order dated 18.01.2025, on the ground that the proceedings were conducted in gross violation of the principles of natural justice.

During the hearing, the respondent department appeared in person and tried to justify that the petitioner was afforded an opportunity of hearing before passing of the impugned order.

Know the complete aspects of tax implications of succession, Click here

However, the Court, after perusing the records, found that while some interaction took place before the issuance of the show cause notice, no personal hearing was granted at the subsequent crucial stage. Notably, during the proceedings held on 24.12.2024, the records produced by the petitioner were merely returned to its accountant, with no proper hearing afforded thereafter.

In addition, the Additional Advocate General appearing for the State conceded that the action of the department could not be sustained, as the petitioner was not provided proper hearing which is a right guaranteed under Section 75(4) of the HPGST Act.

Complete Ready to Use PDFs of 200+ Agreements Click here

The bench comprising Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Sushil Kukreja allowed the writ petition. The impugned order dated 18.01.2025 was set aside with a direction that the petitioner be granted a proper personal hearing. The Court directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent authority with its reply and all relevant documents on 02.08.2025.

The Court further directed that all future proceedings shall be conducted only after providing the petitioner with an adequate opportunity to be heard and to place relevant material on record.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscanpremium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Chander Mukhi Resorts Private Limited vs The State of Himachal Pradesh , 2025 TAXSCAN (HC) 1369 , CWP No.6746 of 2025 , 18 July 2025 , Mr. Rishabh Jain , Mr. Anup Rattan
Chander Mukhi Resorts Private Limited vs The State of Himachal Pradesh
CITATION :  2025 TAXSCAN (HC) 1369Case Number :  CWP No.6746 of 2025Date of Judgement :  18 July 2025Coram :  Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaCounsel of Appellant :  Mr. Rishabh JainCounsel Of Respondent :  Mr. Anup Rattan
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019