Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

ITAT Allows Final Opportunity to Explain Non-filing of Return on Payment of ₹5k Cost, Remands Matter to JAO [Read Order]

JAO to consider merits of submissions made by assessee. Bank statements and unregistered sale deed to be produced in the final opportunity

ITAT Allows Final Opportunity to Explain Non-filing of Return on Payment of ₹5k Cost, Remands Matter to JAO [Read Order]
X

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, allowed one final opportunity to explain non-filing of return of income to the assessee-appellant. The tribunal added a fine of INR 5,000 and remanded the matter to the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO). The appeal was filed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless...


The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, allowed one final opportunity to explain non-filing of return of income to the assessee-appellant. The tribunal added a fine of INR 5,000 and remanded the matter to the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO).

The appeal was filed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 11.03.2025. This appellate order arose out of the ex-parte reassessment order passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) relating to Assessment Year 2012-13.

The facts of the case state that the assessee is a retired teacher whose sons and daughter migrated to Canada in 2004. During the Financial Year 2011-12, she sold out her old house and purchased a new one for a consideration of INR 42,00,000/-. Since the assessee has not filed return of income and made investment in immovable property, the assessment was reopened by issuing notice under Section 148.

The assessee produced documents to the extent of INR 28,00,000/- for the purchase of immovable property and therefore the Assessing Officer (AO) made addition on the balance of INR 14,00,000/- as undisclosed investment.

This was appealed by the assessee to the CIT(A) who called for a remand report from AO and confirmed the addition made. The assessee-appealant then appealed to the ITAT.

The counsel for the assessee-appellant submitted that the sale of the old house where the considerations of INR 5,00,000/- and INR 4,00,000/- were additional sources. The counsel prayed for one more opportunity to be given to explain the details to the AO as the assessee’s son has an account in Axis Bank whose bank statements could sufficiently explain her expenditure.

The ITAT imposed a INR 5,000/- fine and set aside the orders passed by the lower authorities. The matter was remanded to the JAO to consider the merits in the assessee’s final opportunity to cooperate. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Shantaben Joitaram Patel vs The ITO , 2026 TAXSCAN (ITAT) 257 , ITA No: 1029/Ahd/2025 , 20 February 2026 , M S Chhajed, A.R , Suresh Chand Meena, Sr.D.R
Shantaben Joitaram Patel vs The ITO
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (ITAT) 257Case Number :  ITA No: 1029/Ahd/2025Date of Judgement :  20 February 2026Coram :  T.R. Senthil Kumar , Narendra Prasad SinhaCounsel of Appellant :  M S Chhajed, A.RCounsel Of Respondent :  Suresh Chand Meena, Sr.D.R
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019