NCLT Has Jurisdiction to Examine Gift Deed Fraud in Oppression & Mismanagement Cases: Supreme Court [Read Order]

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of India held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has jurisdiction to examine allegations of fraud relating to a gift deed when such allegations form the core of a dispute involving oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act.

GST on Real Estate & Works Contracts – Your Ultimate Guide to GST in the Real Estate Sector! Click here

Mrs. Shailja Krishna, the appellant, had approached the NCLT claiming that her resignation and transfer of shares in Satori Global Limited had been obtained through fraud, coercion, and manipulation. The NCLT allowed her petition in 2018, restoring her as a director and shareholder. In 2023, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) set aside that decision, reasoning that issues of fraud and coercion could only be tried by a civil court.

The appellant’s counsel argued that Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 empowered the NCLT to inquire into acts of oppression and mismanagement even if they involved fraudulent transfer of shares. They also argued that the gift deed was invalid under the Articles of Association which did not permit transfer of shares by way of gift to a mother-in-law and that the board meetings where her resignation was allegedly accepted were held without notice or quorum.

The respondents’ counsel argued that the NCLT exceeded its jurisdiction in ruling on fraud and forgery, which required a full civil trial with oral evidence. The counsel also argued that the appellant had validly resigned and transferred her shares and that her later complaints were delayed and without merit.

The bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice K. Vinod Chandran observed that the NCLT has wide powers to decide matters incidental to complaints of oppression and mismanagement and explained that refusing to exercise this jurisdiction would defeat the purpose of the law.

The court pointed out that the gift deed violated the company’s Articles of Association and that the surrounding circumstances, including altered share transfer forms and irregular board meetings, demonstrated oppression and mismanagement.

The court held that the gift deed and share transfers were invalid, that the board meetings of 15 December 2010 and 17 December 2010 were conducted illegally, and that the appellant was unlawfully removed from management. The judgment of the NCLAT was set aside and the NCLT’s order was restored.

The court allowed the appeals and directed that the appellant be reinstated as director and shareholder, with all consequential reliefs. Parties were directed to bear their own costs.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates