Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Non-Production of BIS Certificate & DGFT Authorisation: Madras HC Orders Provisional Release of 123 Used Digital MFDs [Read Order]

Madras HC redirects matter to the Customs Department. Final adjudication and conditions for provisional release to be made by them.

Non-Production of BIS Certificate & DGFT Authorisation: Madras HC Orders Provisional Release of 123 Used Digital MFDs [Read Order]
X

In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court directed the Customs Department to pass orders for provisional release of 123 units of second-hand Digital Multifunction Print, Copying and Scanning Machines imported after the goods were detained for non-production of BIS certificate and DGFT authorisation. Also Read:Change in Opinion Insufficient for Reassessment: ITAT highlights Validity...


In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court directed the Customs Department to pass orders for provisional release of 123 units of second-hand Digital Multifunction Print, Copying and Scanning Machines imported after the goods were detained for non-production of BIS certificate and DGFT authorisation.

The petitioner, represented by S. Shriram and N. Viswanathan, had imported Second Hand Highly Specialized Equipments - Digital Multifunction Print & Copying Devices (MFDs) which were detained by the Customs Department for non-production of BIS Certificate and Authorization from the DGFT.

The petitioner argued that similar cases were already decided by the High Court in earlier batch of writ petitions and in those cases directions were given for provisional release. So same relief should be granted here also.

After hearing both sides, the Court observed that the relief sought in the present writ petition is identical to the one sought in the earlier batch of matters. The Court found that when similar importers had been granted directions for provisional release, the same course must be followed in the present case as well.

Accordingly, the Court disposed of the writ petition directing the Customs Department to pass orders for provisional release while imposing conditions. However, the bench comprising Justice Abdul Quddhose noted that the provisional release was subject to the final adjudication that the Customs Department have to undertake.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

M/s.Tulasi Enterprises Shop No.22 vs The Commissioner Of Customs Chennai II Import Commissionerate , 2026 TAXSCAN (HC) 404 , WP No. 6569 of 2026 , 19 February 2026 , Mr.S.Shriram , Mr.T.Nalinidhar
M/s.Tulasi Enterprises Shop No.22 vs The Commissioner Of Customs Chennai II Import Commissionerate
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (HC) 404Case Number :  WP No. 6569 of 2026Date of Judgement :  19 February 2026Coram :  ABDUL QUDDHOSECounsel of Appellant :  Mr.S.ShriramCounsel Of Respondent :  Mr.T.Nalinidhar
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019