Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Non-use of Car for Business Purpose cannot Deny Depreciation and Interest on Car Loan: ITAT Partially Allows Appeal [Read Order]

The AO had argued that the vehicles were not used during the AY 2015-16 and the assessee-company did not have any employees in the same year.

Non-use of Car for Business Purpose cannot Deny Depreciation and Interest on Car Loan: ITAT Partially Allows Appeal [Read Order]
X

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), NewDelhi Bench, partially allowed an appeal wherein the depreciation and interest on car loan was denied due to non-use for business purpose. The facts were that the assessee, a global affiliate marketing network, was selected for scrutiny assessment. The Assessing Officer (AO) upon examination concluded that the amount charged by them...


The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), NewDelhi Bench, partially allowed an appeal wherein the depreciation and interest on car loan was denied due to non-use for business purpose.

The facts were that the assessee, a global affiliate marketing network, was selected for scrutiny assessment. The Assessing Officer (AO) upon examination concluded that the amount charged by them was excessive and not at Arm’s Length. Accordingly, additions were made to the assessee's income.

The first issue was regarding the addition of INR 2,10,00,000/- made under Section 40A(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the premise of excessive payment made and its confirmation by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

The other issues were regarding disallowance of depreciation and interest on car loan and disallowance of HR recruitment, placement expenditure and staff welfare expenses.

The AO had argued that the vehicles were not used during the AY 2015-16 and the assessee-company did not have any employees in the same year.

The counsel for the assessee argued explaining the modalities of the business of email marketing, providing a paper book as evidence. With regards to the depreciation and interest on car loan, it was further submitted that the non-use of the asset for business purpose would not be a ground to deny claim of depreciation and interest.

The result of the appeal was that it was partly allowed as the bench of Satbeer Singh Godara (Judicial Member) and Amitabh Shukla (Accountant Member) disallowed the HR recruitment and placement expenditure as well as the staff welfare expenditure but deleted the addition made under Section 40A(2) and allowed the claim of depreciation and interest on the car loan.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

V Commission Media Private Limited vs ACIT, Circle-26(1) , 2026 TAXSCAN (ITAT) 337 , ITA No.4071/DEL/2024 , 20 March 2026 , Shri Pulkit Saini, Adv. , Ms. Ankush Kalra, Sr. DR
V Commission Media Private Limited vs ACIT, Circle-26(1)
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (ITAT) 337Case Number :  ITA No.4071/DEL/2024Date of Judgement :  20 March 2026Coram :  SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTNAT MEMBERCounsel of Appellant :  Shri Pulkit Saini, Adv.Counsel Of Respondent :  Ms. Ankush Kalra, Sr. DR
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019