![ITAT Affirms CIT(A)s Deletion of Bad Debts of ₹1.26 Cr, Management Fee and Depreciation Citing Submission and Verification of Evidence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/21/500x300_2107202-whatsapp-image-2025-11-21-at-50428-pm.webp "ITAT Affirms CIT(A)s Deletion of Bad Debts of ₹1.26 Cr, Management Fee and Depreciation Citing Submission and Verification of Evidence [Read Order]")
ITAT Affirms CIT(A)'s Deletion of Bad Debts of ₹1.26 Cr, Management Fee and Depreciation Citing Submission and Verification of Evidence [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]’s order, which had deleted...
![Recovery u/s 11A is Unjustified as Refund Orders Had Attained Finality Without Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/21/250x150_2107068-refund-recovery-proceedings-taxscan.webp "Recovery u/s 11A is Unjustified as Refund Orders Had Attained Finality Without Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Cost-Sharing Among Group Entities for Events Outside India Does Not Amount to Taxable Service: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/20/250x150_2106930-cestat-taxscan.webp "Cost-Sharing Among Group Entities for Events Outside India Does Not Amount to Taxable Service: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Sabudana Duty Quashed: CESTAT Holds 'Nil' Rate Notification on Tapioca Sago is Curative and Operates Retrospectively [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise &Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has quashed the excise duty demand on "Sabudana" (Tapioca Sago), ruling that Notification No. 12/2013-CE, ...
![Sabudana Duty Quashed: CESTAT Holds Nil Rate Notification on Tapioca Sago is Curative and Operates Retrospectively [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/20/500x300_2106905-sabudana-cestat-nil-rate-tapioca-sago-curative-retrospectively-taxscan.webp "Sabudana Duty Quashed: CESTAT Holds Nil Rate Notification on Tapioca Sago is Curative and Operates Retrospectively [Read Order]")
![NCLAT Dismisses Section 9 Application for Non-Service of Demand Notice u/s 8 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/20/500x300_2106858-nclat-ruling-corporate-debtor-taxscan.webp "NCLAT Dismisses Section 9 Application for Non-Service of Demand Notice u/s 8 [Read Order]")
Commissioner's Report, Toll Barrier Receipts Shows Manufacturing Activity Verified: CESTAT Rejects Clandestine Removal Allegation [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has quashed the excise duty demand and ruled that the allegation of non-manufacture based on a third-party ...
![Commissioners Report, Toll Barrier Receipts Shows Manufacturing Activity Verified: CESTAT Rejects Clandestine Removal Allegation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/20/500x300_2106916-cestat-chandigarh-toll-barrier-receipts-evidence-taxscan.webp "Commissioners Report, Toll Barrier Receipts Shows Manufacturing Activity Verified: CESTAT Rejects Clandestine Removal Allegation [Read Order]")
Interest Not Payable from 2008 Deposit: CESTAT Holds Sugar Manufacturer Not Entitled to Interest on Investigative Deposit [Read Order]
CESTAT denies interest from 2008 deposit, allowing Revenue’s appeal The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed the Revenue’s...
![Interest Not Payable from 2008 Deposit: CESTAT Holds Sugar Manufacturer Not Entitled to Interest on Investigative Deposit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/20/500x300_2106836-fa80a3f0-beb7-4f16-b45e-10733eba48aa.webp "Interest Not Payable from 2008 Deposit: CESTAT Holds Sugar Manufacturer Not Entitled to Interest on Investigative Deposit [Read Order]")
Tugs Classified under Chapter 89, Not ‘Machinery or Equipment’: CESTAT Rejects Exemption Claim but Allows Drawback [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that two imported tugs used for the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) dredging project at Hazira...
![Tugs Classified under Chapter 89, Not ‘Machinery or Equipment’: CESTAT Rejects Exemption Claim but Allows Drawback [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/20/500x300_2106841-cestat-ahmedbad-cestat-rejects-exemption-claim-taxscan.webp "Tugs Classified under Chapter 89, Not ‘Machinery or Equipment’: CESTAT Rejects Exemption Claim but Allows Drawback [Read Order]")
NCLAT Upholds CCI’s Jurisdiction Under Section 4 of the Competition Act to Probe WhatsApp–Meta Data-Sharing Practices [Read Order]
In a landmark judgment, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has upheld the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) jurisdiction to investigate WhatsApp and its parent company, Meta...
![NCLAT Upholds CCI’s Jurisdiction Under Section 4 of the Competition Act to Probe WhatsApp–Meta Data-Sharing Practices [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/20/500x300_2106818-whatsapps-data-sharing-policy-data-sharing-policy-taxscan.webp "NCLAT Upholds CCI’s Jurisdiction Under Section 4 of the Competition Act to Probe WhatsApp–Meta Data-Sharing Practices [Read Order]")