Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

PCIT Must Explain How Income Tax Assessment Order is Erroneous u/s 263: ITAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]

PCIT Must Explain How Income Tax Assessment Order is Erroneous u/s 263: ITAT Allows Appeal

PCIT Must Explain How Income Tax Assessment Order is Erroneous u/s 263: ITAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]
X

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, allowed the appeal by the assessee and held that PCIT has not explained how the assessing officer erred in assessment order regarding the income of the assessee thus making it erroneous. The facts of the case state that the assessee completed under Section 143(3)) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act (the Act) vide...


The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, allowed the appeal by the assessee and held that PCIT has not explained how the assessing officer erred in assessment order regarding the income of the assessee thus making it erroneous.

The facts of the case state that the assessee completed under Section 143(3)) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act (the Act) vide order dated 06.09.2022, assesses the total income at INR 93,87,13,869/- after making the addition of INR 85,87,129/- as expenditure on cess was disallowed.

Also Read: ITAT Grants Deduction under Section 54F to NRI: Residential Houses Outside and Inside India Considered

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Faridabad, noticed that TDS has been deducted on the fees of INR 5,45,71,846/- paid by the assessee for professional or technical services. However as per the return of income they have been claimed at INR 3,27,75,797/-. The difference is observed to have no explanation and the Assessing Officer (AO) had not sought such explanation. The salary that the assessee paid in the assessment year was amounting to INR 11,55,18,514/- on which TDS has been deducted. On the return of income, the salary was claimed at INR 20,93,51,160/-. Again, no explanation was sought nor given.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Studds Accessories Limited vs PCIT Faridabad , 2026 TAXSCAN (ITAT) 242 , ITA No. 3570/ DEL/2025 , 12.02.2026 , Sh. Vishal Kalkra, Adv & Ms. Reema Grewal, CA & Ms. Snigdha Gautam, Adv , Sh. Avikal Manu, CIT DR
Studds Accessories Limited vs PCIT Faridabad
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (ITAT) 242Case Number :  ITA No. 3570/ DEL/2025Date of Judgement :  12.02.2026Coram :  BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER and SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBERCounsel of Appellant :  Sh. Vishal Kalkra, Adv & Ms. Reema Grewal, CA & Ms. Snigdha Gautam, AdvCounsel Of Respondent :  Sh. Avikal Manu, CIT DR
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019