Professional Misconduct during Statutory Audit of Religare Finvest: Delhi HC Directs Petitioner to File Objections towards NFRA SCN [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court passed an order aligning with the decision of the Supreme Court in a similar matter involving the NFRA
![Professional Misconduct during Statutory Audit of Religare Finvest: Delhi HC Directs Petitioner to File Objections towards NFRA SCN [Read Order] Professional Misconduct during Statutory Audit of Religare Finvest: Delhi HC Directs Petitioner to File Objections towards NFRA SCN [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/2070831-professional-misconduct-during-statutory-audit-statutory-audit-statutory-audit-of-religare-finvest-taxscan.webp)
The Delhi High Court recently directed a petitioner who challenged a Show Cause Notice issued by the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) in relation to alleged professional misconduct during the statutory audit of M/s Religare Finvest Ltd., to file their objections towards the same.
The petitioner, Sunil Wahal represented by Abhimanyu Bhandari, Arjun Syal and Shreya, assailed a Show Cause Notice dated 30.12.2024 issued by the NFRA, contending that the proceedings initiated under Section 132(4)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 11 of the NFRA Rules, 2018 were arbitrary, illegal, and without jurisdiction.
Also Read:GST Payer Not a Defaulter If Appeal Filed with Pre-Deposit: Delhi HC Directs to Process Fresh Registration and NOC Issuance [Read Order]
The Show Cause Notice pertained to allegations of misconduct against the petitioner, from his role as the Engagement Quality Control Reviewer (EQCR) in the said audit engagement for M/s Religare Finvest Ltd. for the financial year 2017-18.
Stay Updated with the Latest Audit Report Formats & Audit Trials Requirements!, Click Here
The matter was first listed before the Delhi High Court on 06.02.2025, when it was specifically contended by the petitioner that the legal issues involved in the present writ petition were identical to those in W.P.(C) 1135/2025 before the same Court, in which interim relief had already been granted by the Court on 30.01.2025. On this basis, interim protection was similarly extended to the petitioner in the current matter.
Subsequently, the Respondent No. 1 (NFRA) filed a Civil Miscellaneous Application (CM APPL.), pointing out that the interim relief granted in W.P.(C) 1135/2025 had been challenged before the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No. 5468/2025 titled National Financial Regulatory Authority vs. Charmi M. Shah and Anr.
The Supreme Court, while disposing of the SLP, granted liberty to the respondent to file objections to the impugned Show Cause Notice within four weeks. The apex court directed that the said objections be duly considered by the authority, including the issue of exercisable jurisdiction and that a speaking order on the same be passed.
The Supreme Court had further directed that no coercive steps were to be taken against the respondent until such time as the speaking order was passed.
Stay Updated with the Latest Audit Report Formats & Audit Trials Requirements!, Click Here
Relying on the aforesaid directions of the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court Bench presided by Justice Sachin Datta allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Application filed by the NFRA and directed that the petitioner be entitled to file objections to the NFRA Show Cause Notice within the stipulated period, which shall be duly considered by the authority in accordance with law.
Also Read:NFRA Retrospective Jurisdiction: Telangana HC Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Show Cause Notices for Pre-2018 Professional Misconduct [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court further clarified that the earlier date fixed for hearing, i.e., 31.07.2025, stood cancelled in terms of the disposal of the present case.
Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates