Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Rajasthan HC Upholds Insertion of New ‘Sleeper Bus’ Tax Category in State Motor Vehicle Tax Rules [Read Order]

Rajasthan High Court upheld the State’s insertion of a new “Sleeper Bus” tax category and quashed defective demand notices.

Kavi Priya
Rajasthan HC Upholds Insertion of New ‘Sleeper Bus’ Tax Category in State Motor Vehicle Tax Rules [Read Order]
X

In a recent ruling, the Rajasthan High Court upheld the State Government’s authority to insert a new category of “Sleeper Bus” for the purpose of motor vehicle taxation and quashed demand notices issued without following proper legal procedure. Khuman Singh, the petitioner, filed a writ petition challenging the amendment made by the Transport Department of Rajasthan through...


In a recent ruling, the Rajasthan High Court upheld the State Government’s authority to insert a new category of “Sleeper Bus” for the purpose of motor vehicle taxation and quashed demand notices issued without following proper legal procedure.

Khuman Singh, the petitioner, filed a writ petition challenging the amendment made by the Transport Department of Rajasthan through a notification dated 24 February 2021. By this amendment, a new category at Serial No. 7(a)(iii) “Sleeper Bus” was inserted in the earlier notification dated 10 July 2019.

The petitioner also challenged the subsequent notices in Form MTR dated 24 March 2023 and in Form MTQ dated 21 June 2023 demanding tax for the period between April 2022 and June 2023.

Practical Case Studies in Forensic Accounting & Corporate Fraud Investigation - Click Here

The petitioner’s counsel argued that the State Government had no authority to create a new class of vehicles on the basis of body type, since classification of motor vehicles is the exclusive domain of the Central Government under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The counsel further argued that the amendment was arbitrary, discriminatory, and in violation of Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner also submitted that the demand notices were issued in breach of Rule 8 of the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1951, without giving a proper hearing or providing a certified computation order.

The State’s counsel argued that the insertion of the “Sleeper Bus” category was justified and in public interest. They explained that sleeper buses are primarily meant for long-distance night travel, and granting them exemption would have led to a shift of such buses to regional routes, reducing availability for long journeys.

The respondents further argued that the State was well within its powers under Section 4 of the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951 to categorize vehicles for taxation, and that the validity of “Sleeper Coach” under the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Rules, 1990 had already been upheld earlier by the High Court. The Union of India supported the stand of the State Government.

The Division Bench comprising Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur and Justice Anuroop Singhi observed that the vehicle in question was registered as a “Bus,” and that the State had the competence to further categorize buses based on body type for taxation purposes.

Tax Planning For NRIs - Click Here

The court pointed out that “Sleeper Bus” and “Sleeper Coach” are the same, and since the latter is already defined under the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Rules, 1990, there was no illegality in creating the category for taxation.

The court explained that exemptions may be granted or denied by the State depending on public interest, and in this case, the decision not to extend exemption to sleeper buses was justified.

Want a deeper insight into the Income Tax Bill, 2025? Click here

At the same time, the court found that the demand notices issued in March and June 2023 did not comply with Rule 8 of the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1951, as they failed to provide proper reasoning or attach a certified computation order. The court quashed both notices but upheld the validity of the amendment inserting the new category.

The court partly allowed the writ petitions, holding that the State Government’s insertion of the new “Sleeper Bus” tax category was lawful, but the impugned demand notices were invalid. The respondents were given liberty to initiate fresh proceedings strictly in accordance with law.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Khuman Singh S/o Smrith Singh vs State Of Rajasthan , 2025 TAXSCAN (HC) 1726 , D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11535/2023 , 22 August 2025 , Mr. Saurabh Maheshwari , Mr. Sajjan Singh Rathore
Khuman Singh S/o Smrith Singh vs State Of Rajasthan
CITATION :  2025 TAXSCAN (HC) 1726Case Number :  D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11535/2023Date of Judgement :  22 August 2025Coram :  MR. VINIT KUMAR MATHUR & MR. ANUROOP SINGHICounsel of Appellant :  Mr. Saurabh MaheshwariCounsel Of Respondent :  Mr. Sajjan Singh Rathore
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019