Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Refund arises out of Excise Duty Demand Deletion must be Claimed through Separate Statutory Procedure, Not Before Tribunal: CESTAT [Read Order]

CESTAT dismisses appeal. Refund from deletion of excise duty demand to be claimed from separate proceedings.

Refund arises out of Excise Duty Demand Deletion must be Claimed through Separate Statutory Procedure, Not Before Tribunal: CESTAT [Read Order]
X

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that refund issues arising out of the deletion of excise duty demand must be claimed through a separate statutory procedure and the same cannot be claimed or appealed for before the tribunal. The appellant, Jeevan Diesels and Electricals Limited, a company from Bangalore, challenged the...


The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that refund issues arising out of the deletion of excise duty demand must be claimed through a separate statutory procedure and the same cannot be claimed or appealed for before the tribunal.

The appellant, Jeevan Diesels and Electricals Limited, a company from Bangalore, challenged the Order-in-Orginal dated 30.11.206 and 24.10.2016 which imposed excise duty demand before the Commissioner (Appeals). The First Appellate Authority/Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals-II), Chennai, deleted all the additions made to the Order-in-Original and deleted the demands and the penalty.

Also Read:BIFR Waiver of ₹81.60L Customs Demand Binding: Madras HC Quashes CESTAT Pre-Deposit Against SMS Lifesciences [Read Order]

Then, the petitioner filed a writ petition before the tribunal, praying for a refund of Rs. 15,35,738 with interest as the facts in the order showed demands were frivolous and the litigation was thrust on them.

K. S. Jain, Managing Director of the appellant-company appeared in person and G. Kriupa (Superintendent) appeared for the Revenue, as both sides were heard and placed on record.

The two-member bench comprising P. Dinesh (Judicial) and Vasa Seshagiri Rao (Technical) perused the impugned order and documents placed before them. The tribunal observed that the First Appellate Authority already deleted all the demands and the penalty.

Going into the prayer, the tribunal observed that any refund claim arising as a consequence of an order must be pursued through separate proceedings. It added that CESTAT cannot go into the issue of the refund. The tribunal did not see any justification for entertaining this appeal.

The appeal of the appellant was dismissed.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Jeevan Diesels & Electricals Ltd vs The Commissioner of GST Central Excise , 2026 TAXSCAN (CESTAT) 147 , Excise Appeal No. 42241 of 2017 , 12 january 2026 , K.S. Jain, Managing Director , G. Krupa, Authorized Representative
Jeevan Diesels & Electricals Ltd vs The Commissioner of GST Central Excise
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (CESTAT) 147Case Number :  Excise Appeal No. 42241 of 2017Date of Judgement :  12 january 2026Coram :  P. DINESHA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL), VASA SESHAGIRI RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)Counsel of Appellant :  K.S. Jain, Managing DirectorCounsel Of Respondent :  G. Krupa, Authorized Representative
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019