Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Rejection of Registration Application for Wrong Section Code: ITAT Allows Revised Form 10D Filing Before CIT(E) [Read Order]

The assessee submitted that the e-filing portal only allowed selection under Section 12A(1), and no dropdown options were available for Section 10(23C)(vi) or other relevant sub-clauses for AY 2022–23 onwards.

Rejection of Registration Application for Wrong Section Code: ITAT Allows Revised Form 10D Filing Before CIT(E) [Read Order]
X

The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allows revised Form 10D filing before Commissioner of Income Tax ( Exemption)[CIT(E)], after rejecting the initial registration application for wrong section code. Senate of Serampore College ,appellant-assessee, had applied for registration under Section 10(23C)(ii) using Form 10D. The CIT(E) rejected...


The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allows revised Form 10D filing before Commissioner of Income Tax ( Exemption)[CIT(E)], after rejecting the initial registration application for wrong section code.

Senate of Serampore College ,appellant-assessee, had applied for registration under Section 10(23C)(ii) using Form 10D. The CIT(E) rejected the application, citing selection of the wrong section code, and advised filing a fresh Form 10B with the correct code. Aggrieved by this, the assessee filed an appeal before the tribunal.

The assessee counsel explained that despite the CIT(E)’s direction to file a fresh Form 10B with the correct section code, the e-filing portal did not provide the necessary options. Upon accessing the portal, only Section 12A(1) was available in the dropdown menu, and no selection was possible for Section 10(23C)(vi) or any other relevant sub-clause under Section 10(23C) for AY 2022-23 onwards.

Comprehensive Guide of Law and Procedure for Filing of Income Tax Appeals, Click Here

The counsel, therefore, requested that the matter be sent back to the CIT(E) with instructions to consider the assessee’s fresh application. The departmental representative did not object to this request.

The two member bench Pradip Kumar Choubey (Judicial Member) and Rakesh Mishra (Accountant Member) noted that the CIT(E) had directed the assessee to file a fresh Form 10D with the correct section code. The assessee submitted that the e-filing portal only allowed selection of Section 10(23C)(vi) and no other option. An affidavit was also filed in support of this claim.

Considering the CIT(E)’s order and the assessee’s submission, the appellate tribunal remitted the matter back to the CIT(E) with a direction to consider the application afresh and allow the assessee to file a revised Form 10D with the correct section code.

Therefore,the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscanpremium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019