Relief for Real Estate Developer: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Bulk Notional Rent Addition on Vacant Commercial Space [Read Order]

The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld substantial relief granted to a real estate developer by holding that notional rent could not be computed for the period during which the unsold commercial units were held as stock-in-trade and dismissed the Revenue’s appeal challenging the deletion of a major notional rent addition.

The Revenue had challenged the order of the CIT(A) deleting most of the addition of Rs. 4.39 crore made towards notional rent in the case of AAkarshan Estate Pvt. Ltd. for Assessment Year 2018-19.

🧾 Decode Complex Tax Audit Clauses with Practical Clarity | Click Here

The assessee, AAkarshan Estate Pvt. Ltd., had developed a commercial project known as “M2K Corporate Park” at Sector-51, Gurgaon. During the relevant year, the assessee converted its remaining unsold inventory measuring 1,84,294.33 square feet from stock-in-trade into investment property with effect from 1 January 2018.

During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that part of the commercial space had been let out and generated rental income. According to the AO, the balance area was also capable of earning rent. Based on this reasoning, the AO computed notional rent of Rs. 4,39,49,118 and added the amount to the assessee’s income.

Also Read:Section 249(4)(b) of Income Tax Act Inapplicable when Advance Tax not Payable: ITAT [Read Order]

The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The appellate authority observed that Section 23(5) specifically provides relief in respect of property held as stock-in-trade. The CIT(A) found that the AO had wrongly computed notional rent for the entire year without distinguishing between the period when the property was stock-in-trade and the period after its conversion into an investment asset.

The CIT(A) further observed that only 48,692 square feet remained vacant during the relevant period and computed notional rent only for the three-month post-conversion period from January to March 2018. After allowing the statutory deduction under Section 24(a), the addition was restricted to Rs. 51,12,660.

Before the tribunal, the Revenue argued that since part of the premises had been leased out and rental income was earned, the unsold portion was also capable of generating rental income and should be subjected to notional rent. The assessee’s counsel relied on the findings of the CIT(A) and various tribunal decisions supporting its case.

The bench comprising Satbeer Singh Godara (Judicial Member) and Naveen Chandra (Accountant Member) observed that the CIT(A) had correctly applied Section 23(5) while determining the annual letting value of the vacant area after conversion of the property from stock-in-trade to a capital asset.

The tribunal further observed that the findings of the CIT(A) regarding the actual vacant area and computation of notional rent were reasonable and based on correct facts. Finding no reason to interfere with the appellate order, the tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates