Revisionary Proceedings Under GST: Hidden Risks for Taxpayers

The "one nation, one tax" model of the GST regime in India is often taken into consideration but there exists a procedural maze of powers granted to the authorities . One of such powers is enshrined in Section 108 of the CGST Act, 2017 that empowers the Revisional Authorities to reopen decisions that are otherwise considered settled.

In the context of implementation of the GSTAppellate Tribunal (GSTAT) in the 2026-27 financial year as well as transformation towards GST 2.0, it is not enough to overlook the risks inherent in revisionary proceedings anymore.

​A revisionary power is regarded as the supervisory power of a Revisional Authority that entitles the right of such authority to inspect and examine the records of any decision making process. The Revisional Authority believe that some decision or order issued by the subordinate officers are erroneous as it is prejudicial to the interest of revenue and they may suspend, correct, cancel or increase the demand.

Unlike an appeal which is an exercise of the right of an aggrieved person a revision is generally invoked not by the taxpayer but by the Department.

Learn How to Use AI in GST Returns, Notices & Litigation[CLICK HERE]

The evolving scenario of indirect taxation in India, there are five risks that taxpayers face from the Department's revision powers:

• Unlike taxpayers who only get one shot at an appeal the Department can make use of Section 108 to resurre the cases that were already settled.

• In case if an adjudicating officer had agreed with your contentions and issued an order in your favor, a senior officer can unilaterally reverse that decision saying that it was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.

• The power of revision is not confined merely to making minor adjustments. The Revisional Authority has the legal mandate to enhance the tax liability, including the amount of taxes, interest, and penalties imposed.

• The Department may file a revision even when the matter has been settled by a prior appeal on other matters. Thus, taxpayers never achieve true finality regarding their entire assessment order.

• In view of AI and data sharing across platforms (involving GST, IT, and Customs), revisionary authorities will have access to detailed reports which automatically identify inconsistencies that could have been overlooked in the initial stage of adjudication.

As India has implemented the Income Tax Act 2025 effectively from April 1, 2026, there appears to be an increased effort to share data across departments. Any discrepancies identified during an IT audit are increasingly being highlighted to GST revisionary authorities.

Struggling with GST? Let AI Do the Work![CLICK HERE]

To mitigate the hidden risks associated with Section 108, businesses should adopt a proactive strategy as given below:

• ​The first line of defense is ensuring that every potential point of contention is explicitly raised during the initial appeal.

• ​Taxpayers should never treat a favorable order from a subordinate officer as a final unassailable victory. Instead, businesses must critically analyze these successful orders to identify potential errors or gaps that a Commissioner might have made.

• Setting a strong base during the stage of adjudication is the best method to prevent revision in the future.

• Since the establishment of the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) continuous scrutiny of portal alerts and registry announcements has become essential. Taxpayers must stay up to date on any changes in procedures to effectively use the new avenue of filing objections to the Department’s actions.

• Given the deadline of June 30 2026 for the backlog this provides only one chance to file objections to the previous acts of revision by the department over the course of the last seven years. It is therefore important that businesses check their Revisionary Orders for the period of 2017 to assess whether an objection can be filed.

The process of operationalization of the GST Appellate Tribunal from early 2026 onwards has marked a very important stage for taxpayers. One of the key periods, called the Transitional Window, has been made available from now until June 30, 2026, where appeals can be filed regarding any orders passed since July 2017.

After April 1, 2026, in case of orders passed after this date a standard period of three months is applicable to taxpayers and six months to the Revenue department with an additional three-month period as a concession in case of delay. The process will now require an additional 10% deposit before initiating the appeal even for cases involving only penalty under the Finance Act 2025.

The revisionary process under Section 108 is considered to be one of the most crucial procedural pitfalls in the GST regime. This mechanism questions the principle of finality of dispute resolution and gives the State a second chance to correct the decision.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates