Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

SC Seeks Response On Zoomcar Plea Alleging Denial Of Statutory Remedy after HC Declined GST Appeal Liberty [Read Order]

Supreme Court examines whether taxpayers can be denied statutory GST appeal rights despite High Court declining writ jurisdiction

SC Seeks Response On Zoomcar Plea Alleging Denial Of Statutory Remedy after HC Declined GST Appeal Liberty [Read Order]
X

The Supreme Court of India has sought a response on a plea filed by Zoomcar India Pvt. Ltd., which contends that it was not given the opportunity to exercise its statutory appellate remedy under the GST regime after the Rajasthan High Court had disposed of its writ petition without granting liberty to file an appeal. The Bench consisting Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice...


The Supreme Court of India has sought a response on a plea filed by Zoomcar India Pvt. Ltd., which contends that it was not given the opportunity to exercise its statutory appellate remedy under the GST regime after the Rajasthan High Court had disposed of its writ petition without granting liberty to file an appeal.

The Bench consisting Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K.V. Viswanathan had issued notice while considering the special leave petition. The case arises out of Zoomcar’s challenge to the notifications issued under Section 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

Here, the time limit for passing adjudication orders for FY 2019-20 was extended by invoking the special relaxation powers. Zoomcar had also challenged an adjudication order dated August 8, 2024, passed under Section 73 confirming tax demand along with interest and penalty.

The High Court refused to consider the validity of the notifications, holding that the question was already pending before the Supreme Court in other related cases and the decision in those cases would determine this case.

Nevertheless, Zoomcar argues that although other taxpayers with similar grievances were allowed to file statutory appeals under Section 107 of the CGST Act, they were not given the same freedom. The later request for modification was also disallowed.

READ MORE:“Centre’s New Compliance Requirement”: CBDT Introduces New Form 66 For Determining Book Profit u/s 206(1)

Noting the complaint and making it clear that the challenge is to the orders under Section 73.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court has issued notice on the matter.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Zoomcar India Private Limited vs Union of India & Ors. , 2026 TAXSCAN (HC) 386 , D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16861/2024 , 21 August 2025 , Mr. Prakash Shah, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. H.V. Nandwana, Adv. Mr. Y.V. Nandwana, Adv. , Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG assisted by Ms. Niti Jain Bhandari, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Pathak, Adv. Mr. Kinshuk Jain, Adv.
Zoomcar India Private Limited vs Union of India & Ors.
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (HC) 386Case Number :  D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16861/2024Date of Judgement :  21 August 2025Coram :  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA & HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHITCounsel of Appellant :  Mr. Prakash Shah, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. H.V. Nandwana, Adv. Mr. Y.V. Nandwana, Adv.Counsel Of Respondent :  Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG assisted by Ms. Niti Jain Bhandari, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Pathak, Adv. Mr. Kinshuk Jain, Adv.
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019