Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

SCN Issued Without Mandatory Pre-Consultation Under CBEC Guidelines Is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]

CESTAT held that a show-cause notice issued without the mandatory pre-consultation required under CBEC guidelines is invalid.

Kavi Priya
SCN - Taxscan
X

SCN - Taxscan

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that a show cause notice issued without mandatory pre-consultation under CBEC guidelines is invalid.

SIS Limited, formerly known as Security and Intelligence Services India Ltd., is registered for providing Security Agency, Manpower Supply, and Business Support Services. A show cause notice dated October 18, 2019, was issued for the period 2014-15 to 2016-17, proposing to recover Rs. 6.79 crore, including disallowed CENVAT credit and short-paid service tax.

After adjudication, the Principal Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Patna-I, dropped most of the demand and confirmed Rs. 34,63,730 with interest and penalty. The company appealed before the Tribunal.

Complete practical guide to Drafting Commercial Contracts, Click Here

The appellant’s counsel argued that the notice was issued without following the mandatory pre-show cause consultation required under CBEC Instruction dated December 21, 2015, and Circular No. 1053/02/2017-CX dated March 10, 2017, which applied to all demands exceeding Rs. 50 lakh. He submitted that the relaxation introduced later by Circular No. 1079/03/2021-CX could not apply retrospectively.

The department’s counsel argued that the notice invoked the extended period for suppression, and pre-consultation was not mandatory in such cases. They maintained that the 2021 circular only reiterated the existing position.

Know the complete aspects of tax implications of succession, Click here

The bench comprising R. Muralidhar (Judicial Member) and K. Anpazhakan (Technical Member) observed that the 2017 circular made pre-consultation mandatory for all demands above Rs. 50 lakh, without any exception for suppression.

It explained that the 2021 circular introduced this exception for the first time and applied prospectively. The tribunal pointed out that since the notice was issued in 2019, the procedure should have been followed. It further observed that most of the demand was dropped and the remaining amount lacked proper investigation, as the data came from disclosed records.

The tribunal held that the show cause notice was invalid for want of mandatory pre-consultation and set aside the confirmed demand of Rs. 34,63,730 with interest and penalty. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

M/s. SIS Limited vs Pr. Commissioner of C.G.S.T. and Central Excise
CITATION :  2025 TAXSCAN (CESTAT) 1138Case Number :  Service Tax Appeal No. 75555 of 2024Date of Judgement :  15 October 2025Coram :  R. MURALIDHAR and K. ANPAZHAKANCounsel of Appellant :  Aditya DuttaCounsel Of Respondent :  Prasenjit Das

Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019