Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Services Rendered in Relation to Construction of Roads to Governmental Authorities: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]

Reference was made to the decision in Nizam Sugar Factory v. Collector of Central Excise, A.P. (2006) and the appeal was allowed.

Services Rendered in Relation to Construction of Roads to Governmental Authorities: CESTAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]
X

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, held that since the services rendered by the appellant is in relation to construction of roads to Governmental Authorities, the appeal is directed to be allowed. Also Read:No GST Concession, HDPE Drums Supplied to Third‑Party Manufacturer Not Eligible Under Export Notification: Karnataka HC...


The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, held that since the services rendered by the appellant is in relation to construction of roads to Governmental Authorities, the appeal is directed to be allowed.

The appellant, M/s Lomesh Kumar (DAPL), is a firm engaged in providing workers to Government Authorities. The appellant had surrendered their license in 2015. Taking into consideration that the appellants have rendered taxable services and have not paid applicable service tax, a show cause notice dated 24.05.2021 was issued demanding service tax along with interest and penalties.

The counsel for the appellants submitted evidence in the form of Certificate issued by the customers of service and referred to the decision in Nizam Sugar Factory v. Collector of Central Excise, A.P. (2006).

The tribunal observed that the appellants have rendered services to Governmental Authorities like Uttar Pradesh Public Works Department as has been indicated by the documents and these facts are not denied by the Revenue.

CESTAT also noted that the case has been made on the basis of third party data without ascertaining the type of service rendered, the consideration received etc. It held:

“... these activities are in respect of road work etc. which are exempted by Notification No.25/2012 at Sl. No.12 reproduced below:-

“12. Services provided to the Government, a local authority or a governmental authority by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of –

…

… demands have been made is in respect of exempted services provided to Government Authorities in respect of construction, repair and maintenance of road etc, we do not find any merits in this demand and in the impugned order and set aside the same.”

The two member bench, composed of P.K. Choudhary (Judicial Member) and P. Anjali Kumar (Technical Member), allowed the appeal ultimately.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Lomesh Kumar (DAPL) vs Commissioner, CGST, Ghaziabad , 2026 TAXSCAN (CESTAT) 303 , Service Tax Appeal No.70147 of 2023 , 13 March 2026 , Shri Rajesh Chhibber, Advocate , Shri A. K. Choudhary, Authorized
Lomesh Kumar (DAPL) vs Commissioner, CGST, Ghaziabad
CITATION :  2026 TAXSCAN (CESTAT) 303Case Number :  Service Tax Appeal No.70147 of 2023Date of Judgement :  13 March 2026Coram :  MR. P. K. CHOUDHARY MEMBER (JUDICIAL), MR. P. ANJANI KUMAR MEMBER (TECHNICAL)Counsel of Appellant :  Shri Rajesh Chhibber, AdvocateCounsel Of Respondent :  Shri A. K. Choudhary, Authorized
Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019