Supplies to SEZ: When Refund Works and When it Fails
An in-depth analysis of GST refunds on SEZ supplies, focusing on procedural compliance, documentation lapses, and reasons for rejection.

Supplies made to the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) units or the developers fall under a special segment of the GST system as they are classified as zero-rated supplies to facilitate exports as well as promote activity. From the perspective of the GST, the GST paid on such supplies has to be considered not as a cost and the legislation has provided an effective refund system.
However, the refund on supplies made to the SEZ depends on procedural compliance. Such information regarding the refund is necessary not only for the SEZ units or the developers but also for individuals providing such services.
The refunds work smoothly as long as the supply is clearly established with a zero-rated value. The supplier must ensure that he has supplied his goods or services for the authorized operations of the SEZ unit or developer. The endorsement by the Specified Officer of the SEZ is essential on invoices or other accompanying documents as they attest that they are indeed for authorized activities.
Moreover, the refund claim should also be cited within a certain time limit, along with correct invoices, shipping bills (if applicable), and declarations. However, as long as all the paperwork is in place and correct as well as correct tax reporting under GST returns refunds can be granted without any major issues.
However, a refund fails or gets delayed in case of any procedural or substantive lapse. One of the common reasons for rejection exists on account of the absence or mismatch of SEZ endorsement, which gives doubt regarding whether the supply is zero-rated supply.
Refunds are also denied in cases where supplies are made to SEZ units for operations not authorized, even if the recipient is located in the SEZ area. Errors in invoice details, mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B and incorrect declaration of supply type will further lead to rejection.
That the refund claim shall not be entertained in case of non-satisfaction of any condition laid down under Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, such as improper selection of refund category or missing statements. There are various orders that keep the refund in withheld due to scrutiny, audit, or dues matching but for which proper procedure has to be followed.
In other words, the refund of supplies to SEZ is substance-driven but procedure-sensitive. Though the law provides an undisputed benefit to zero-rated supplies the ultimate practical success of a refund claim largely depends upon documentation, accuracy in returns, and adherence to timelines. In the case of enterprises that supply to SEZs due care regarding compliance with necessary internal checks will help them realize the intended tax neutrality.
Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates



