Transparency at Your Fingertips: Why India Should Let Taxpayers See Every Rupee Spent like “The Australian Model”

Australia's groundbreaking tax transparency system has set a global benchmark, allowing citizens to see precisely how their contributions fund government operations. As India grapples with trust deficits between taxpayers and the state, questions around fiscal accountability, and demands for better governance, the Australian model offers compelling lessons worth examining.

The Australian Innovation: Transparency as a Right, Not a Privilege

When Australians lodge their tax returns through the myTax portal or receive their assessment notices, they get something extraordinary—a tax receipt. This isn't just a routine acknowledgment slip. It's a comprehensive document that breaks down government spending into clear, digestible categories.

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) began issuing these receipts in 2014 following a commitment by the government to enhance transparency around tax expenditure. The initiative was simple yet revolutionary: treat taxpayers like stakeholders who deserve to know how their investments in the nation are being utilized.

Cash Transactions Can Lead to Fines! Are you at risk? Click here

A typical Australian tax receipt shows allocations across major categories including welfare (covering aged care, disability support, family assistance, and unemployment benefits), healthcare (Medicare, pharmaceutical benefits, hospital funding), education, defence, general public services, transport and communication, energy and fuel, industry support, foreign affairs, housing and community development, public order and safety, immigration, and cultural activities. The receipt also includes information on Australian Government gross debt levels for current and previous years, adding another layer of fiscal transparency.

Take, for instance, an Australian taxpayer who contributed AUD 2,190 in taxes. Their receipt would show approximately AUD 846 allocated to welfare, AUD 420 to healthcare, AUD 203 to defence, AUD 183 to education, and AUD 105 to general public services. The granularity is impressive—taxpayers can see allocations even for relatively smaller items like cultural activities and immigration services.

This level of detail has had a profound psychological impact. When an Australian tax receipt went viral on social media, international observers from the United States, Canada, and Britain expressed astonishment and envy. Comments flooded in: "That is how it should be everywhere," and "We need this!" The reaction underscored a universal desire among taxpayers worldwide—not just to pay taxes, but to understand their impact.

Tax Rules Simplified, Practice Amplified! Click here

The technological backbone supporting this transparency is equally impressive. Australians access their tax information through myGov, a centralized digital platform that links various government services. The ATO online services allow individuals to manage their tax affairs, view pre-filled information from employers and banks, lodge returns from any device, and receive their tax receipts digitally. The system is available 24/7, with most refunds processed within two weeks.

Why Transparency Matters: The Trust Dividend

Budget transparency isn't merely about publishing numbers—it's about building the foundational trust that democracies require to function effectively. Research consistently demonstrates that enhanced fiscal transparency significantly improves public confidence in government institutions.

Studies show that jurisdictions implementing robust transparency measures experience trust improvements ranging from 10% to 20% over multi-year periods. Cross-national surveys further reveal that nations scoring highly on budget transparency indices exhibit elevated levels of citizen engagement and satisfaction with government performance. In Estonia, for instance, the deployment of interactive fiscal dashboards led to a remarkable 20% increase in citizen engagement.

The theoretical framework supporting these outcomes is compelling. The principal-agent theory explains that when the information gap between government officials (agents) and the public (principals) narrows, citizens gain the ability to hold officials accountable, reducing opportunistic behaviour and enhancing governance outcomes. Transparency transforms the relationship from one based on blind faith to one grounded in informed participation.

For Australia specifically, the tax transparency program serves a dual purpose: it builds community confidence that taxpayers are paying the right amount of tax, and it ensures that government spending aligns with public priorities. The ATO's Justified Trust program, which targets Australia's top 100 taxpayers, exemplifies this commitment by seeking objective evidence that would lead a reasonable person to conclude a particular taxpayer paid the right amount.

Tax Rules Simplified, Practice Amplified! Click here

The effectiveness of transparency, however, depends on contextual factors including institutional capacity, media freedom, and citizen fiscal literacy. This is where Australia's mature democratic institutions, robust legal framework, and high digital literacy rates create a conducive environment for transparency initiatives to flourish.

India's Transparency Journey: Progress and Gaps

India's approach to fiscal transparency presents a mixed picture—significant strides in certain areas, yet considerable gaps remain when compared to international best practices. The country has made notable progress in publishing budget documents and implementing digital governance initiatives, but the granular, citizen-facing transparency seen in Australia remains largely absent.

According to the Open Budget Survey 2023, India's transparency score reflects improvements in budget information availability, yet the country scores a mere 6 out of 100 in public participation during the budget process. This abysmal participation score highlights a fundamental disconnect: while the government produces substantial fiscal information, mechanisms for meaningful citizen engagement remain woefully inadequate.

India has been consistently publishing tax expenditure reports as part of its annual budget since 2006. However, the Global Tax Expenditures Transparency Index assigns India a score of 52.7 out of 100, indicating significant room for improvement. The reports lack comprehensive information about GST exemptions, clear benchmarks, and detailed policy objectives for all tax expenditures.

The budget transparency landscape at subnational levels is even more concerning. A 2010 study by the Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA) revealed that while some states like Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha make key budget documents available online, most states fail to publish information on allocations targeting disadvantaged groups including scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, and women. The government in only one state in India, Maharashtra makes district-level details of allocations and expenditures available.

The lack of transparency extends to the budget preparation process itself, which remains a largely closed exercise. Citizens, civil society organizations, and even many legislators lack meaningful opportunities to influence budget priorities during the formulation stage. The Planning Commission and Ministry of Finance maintain tight control over estimates, with discussions limited to financial advisers and bureaucrats.

This opacity has real consequences. The Union Budget presentation in Parliament, while procedurally transparent, suffers from severe time constraints. According to PRS Legislative Research, over 94% of budgetary demands were passed without discussion in the five years leading up to 2023. Such perfunctory scrutiny undermines the accountability that transparency is meant to enable.

There have been attempts to address these gaps. A private member's bill titled "The Visual Representation of Income Tax Collected Bill, 2024" was introduced in the Lok Sabha, proposing mandatory visual representation of income tax collection and spending. The bill's statement of objects and reasons eloquently captures the rationale: "By implementing transparent measures and providing clear, visual insights into the collection and spending of income tax, the government can demystify the tax system and make information more readily available to all citizens".

Despite these legislative proposals, implementation remains pending. The contrast with Australia is stark—while Australian taxpayers routinely receive personalized spending breakdowns, Indian taxpayers receive generic assessment orders that reveal nothing about how their contributions serve the nation.

International Best Practices: Lessons from Around the Globe

Australia isn't alone in prioritizing tax and fiscal transparency—several countries have implemented innovative approaches worth examining.

New Zealand has developed a comprehensive Tax Expenditure Statement published alongside its annual budget since 2010. The statement provides transparency around policy-motivated expenditures made through the tax system, bringing New Zealand's financial reporting closer to OECD best-practice standards. The document quantifies the fiscal cost of major tax expenditures and classifies them by policy rationale, enabling informed public debate.

The Nordic countries like Finland, Norway, and Sweden take transparency to extraordinary levels by publishing individual tax records publicly. Norway has published tax records since 1863, while Finland annually shares the names of the country's 10,000 biggest earners. In 2001, Norway made these records searchable online for the first time, allowing any citizen with internet access to view others' incomes easily. While this level of individual transparency raises privacy concerns that may not translate well to India's context, the underlying principle—that taxation should not be shrouded in secrecy—is universally applicable.

South Korea ranks first on the Global Tax Expenditures Transparency Index with a score of 76.1 out of 100. The country's Simplified Year-end Tax Settlement System (SYTSS) provides an online service where the National Tax Service collects and provides data on tax deductions, including expenditure details. This digital-first approach has made tax compliance simpler while simultaneously enhancing transparency.

The United Kingdom has implemented various tax transparency measures targeting large corporate taxpayers. The country scores among the top five globally on budget transparency indices, providing extensive information on government finances throughout the budget cycle.

Common threads run through these successful implementations: strong digital infrastructure, clear legal frameworks mandating disclosure, cultural acceptance of transparency as a democratic norm, and iterative improvements based on citizen feedback. These elements create ecosystems where transparency flourishes rather than remaining a bureaucratic afterthought.

Why India Needs the Australian Model

The case for adopting an Australian-style tax receipt system in India rests on multiple compelling pillars: economic, democratic, and social.

Building Taxpayer Trust and Compliance: India's tax-to-GDP ratio remains among the lowest in the world despite being a major economy. This paradox partially stems from a trust deficit—many citizens question whether their taxes fund public goods or disappear into corruption. A transparent spending breakdown would directly address this concern, potentially improving voluntary compliance. When taxpayers see their contributions translated into tangible services—vaccines for children, pensions for the elderly, salaries for soldiers—the abstract notion of "paying taxes" becomes a concrete act of nation-building.

Enhancing Democratic Accountability: Democracy thrives on informed participation. Currently, Indian citizens vote for representatives who control budgetary allocations, yet most voters have no clear understanding of how public funds are actually spent. Tax receipts would empower citizens with knowledge, enabling more informed electoral choices and more effective advocacy for budgetary reforms. Civil society organizations working on budget accountability would gain powerful tools for analysis and mobilization.

Reducing Corruption and Leakages: Transparency acts as a disinfectant. When government spending is visible at a granular level, misappropriation becomes riskier and more detectable. The knowledge that allocations are subject to public scrutiny creates incentives for prudent financial management. While transparency alone cannot eliminate corruption, it significantly raises the costs and risks for those inclined toward fiscal malfeasance.

Aligning with Digital India Vision: India has made remarkable strides in digital governance through initiatives like Aadhaar, UPI, and various e-governance platforms. The technological infrastructure required for issuing digital tax receipts already exists. The Income Tax Department's e-filing portal processes millions of returns annually. Adding a tax receipt feature would be a natural extension of existing capabilities, requiring modest incremental investment.

International Credibility and Investment Climate: Countries with higher fiscal transparency scores enjoy better access to international financial markets and lower borrowing costs. As India seeks to attract global investment and position itself as a responsible economic power, demonstrating commitment to fiscal transparency enhances credibility. Australia's passage of groundbreaking public country-by-country reporting requirements for multinationals in 2024 has been lauded globally as a "transformational leap forward for global tax transparency". India could similarly enhance its international standing through bold transparency reforms.

Educating Citizens About Governance: Tax receipts serve an important pedagogical function. They educate citizens about the scope and scale of government operations, fostering realistic expectations about public service delivery. When citizens see that welfare consumes the largest share of spending, or that debt servicing claims a significant portion, it grounds political discourse in fiscal reality rather than populist fantasy.

Overcoming Implementation Challenges

Transitioning to an Australian-style system would undoubtedly present challenges that require careful navigation.

Technical Infrastructure: While India's digital payment and e-filing systems are robust, integrating a tax receipt feature across the Income Tax Department's platforms would require coordination between multiple systems. The receipts must be generated automatically upon assessment, delivered through the e-filing portal and email, and archived for future reference. The IT infrastructure handling millions of tax returns annually must be scaled to handle this additional functionality without compromising performance.

Methodological Complexity: Allocating individual tax contributions to spending categories isn't straightforward. Australia appears to use a proportional allocation method—taking the taxpayer's contribution and distributing it according to the overall government budget breakdown. India would need to develop a clear, defensible methodology, deciding whether to include only central government spending or incorporate state-level allocations for a truly comprehensive picture. The inclusion of cesses, surcharges, and GST collections would add layers of complexity requiring technical resolution.

Tax Rules Simplified, Practice Amplified! Click here

Standardization Across Taxes: India's tax structure is more complex than Australia's, with multiple direct and indirect taxes administered by different bodies—the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) handles income tax, while the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) manages GST and customs. Creating a unified view of tax contribution and utilization would require unprecedented coordination between these bodies. The introduction of GST in 2017 significantly transformed India's indirect tax structure, but comprehensive reporting of GST-related tax expenditures remains a gap.

Political Will and Bureaucratic Resistance: Perhaps the most significant challenge is institutional inertia and resistance to change. Transparency threatens entrenched interests that benefit from opacity. Bureaucracies accustomed to operating without public scrutiny may view transparency initiatives as intrusive rather than empowering. Building political consensus across party lines and securing bureaucratic buy-in would be essential for successful implementation.

Ensuring Comprehensibility: Information is only powerful if it's understood. Tax receipts must be designed with the average taxpayer in mind with clear categories, simple language, visual representations where helpful. The Government's Bill on visual representation of income tax specifically emphasizes this point: numbers and statistics can be overwhelming; charts, graphs, and infographics make complex information straightforward. Localization in multiple languages would further enhance accessibility, ensuring that transparency benefits all citizens, not just English-speaking urban elites.

Phased Implementation: Given these challenges, a phased rollout would be prudent. Beginning with a pilot program targeting high-income taxpayers or specific cities would allow the system to be tested, refined, and debugged before nationwide expansion. Early adopters could provide feedback on usability and comprehensibility, informing iterative improvements. This approach mirrors how India successfully scaled initiatives like UPIstarting small, learning quickly, and expanding methodically.

The Road Ahead: From Aspiration to Implementation

The journey toward comprehensive tax transparency in India requires more than technical solutions—it demands a fundamental shift in how the government views its relationship with citizens. Moving from a model where citizens are passive subjects expected to pay without questioning, to one where they are active stakeholders entitled to information, represents a democratic evolution.

Several concrete steps could initiate this transformation:

First, reviving and passing the Visual Representation of Income Tax Collected Bill would provide the legal framework mandating transparency. The Bill, introduced in 2024, needs parliamentary support and executive commitment to move from proposal to law.

Second, the Income Tax Department could begin publishing aggregate data on tax collection and spending allocation, even before individual receipts are issued. Making this information available on the department's website in accessible, visual formats would demonstrate commitment and build public awareness.

Third, leveraging existing digital infrastructure—the e-filing portal, the ITR app, and integration with the Aadhaar ecosystem—would enable rapid deployment once the policy decision is made. The technological prerequisites largely exist; what's missing is political will.

Fourth, engaging civil society organizations, tax professionals, and citizen groups in the design process would ensure that the system truly serves users' needs rather than merely fulfilling bureaucratic requirements. Participatory design creates ownership and increases the likelihood of successful adoption.

Fifth, drawing on international expertise and best practices from countries like Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea would help India avoid reinventing the wheel. International organizations like the OECD and the International Budget Partnership have accumulated substantial knowledge about fiscal transparency that India could leverage.

Finally, framing transparency not as a burden but as an opportunity would help build the necessary political and bureaucratic consensus. Transparency enhances government legitimacy, improves policy quality through public input, and ultimately strengthens democratic institutions. These benefits accrue to the government as much as to citizens.

Conclusion: Transparency as a Democratic Imperative

The question isn't whether India can afford to implement Australian-style tax transparency—it's whether India can afford not to. In an era of heightened citizen expectations, declining trust in institutions, and demands for accountable governance, transparency has moved from being a nice-to-have feature to a democratic imperative.

Australia's model demonstrates that transparency is both technically feasible and politically valuable. Indian taxpayers, like their Australian counterparts, deserve to see how their contributions fuel the nation's progress. They deserve to know that the income tax they pay funds scholarships for children, medical care for the elderly, security at the borders, and roads connecting villages to cities.

When transparency becomes the norm rather than the exception, it transforms citizenship itself. Taxpayers become stakeholders, critics become collaborators, and governance becomes a shared responsibility rather than an imposed obligation. This transformation won't happen overnight, and it won't happen without challenges. But the destination will be a more accountable, responsive, and democratic India is worth the journey.

The Australian model isn't just about receipts and numbers. It's about respect, i.e. respect for the citizens, respect for democracy, and respect for the fundamental principle that those who pay have a right to know. It's time India embraced this principle, moving from opacity to openness, from secrecy to transparency, from distrust to confidence. The technology exists. The framework is proven. What's needed now is the courage to act.

Every rupee counts. Every taxpayer matters. And every citizen deserves to see exactly where their money goes. Let's make it happen.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates