Turning CAs into Whistleblowers: ICAI’s Proposal to SEBI for Tackling Corporate Fraud

In order to improve speedier detection and prevention of frauds that can seriously affect public shareholders and market integrity, this action seeks to capitalize on the special position of certified public accountants and auditors, who frequently have access to early warning signals of financial irregularities within corporations. These were said by the sources to Moneycontrol.

The Reason behind the Proposal

Due to their frequent and intimate contacts with business management, chartered accountants and auditors have access to important financial data and operational advances. Because of their closeness, they can react quickly to possible warning signs like Unexpected spikes in business borrowing, Unusual trends in deals involving linked parties, Company executives' refusals or delays in answering auditor calls or providing information..etc.

Although CAs have been informal whistleblowers in a number of previous events, the ICAI thinks that in order to maximize their impact and guarantee consistent reporting of suspicious actions, a more formal and structured procedure is required.

SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey and ICAI President Charanjot Singh Nanda recently met to talk about creating a working group specifically for this project. The proposal has drawn a lot of interest from SEBI, which has stated that thousands of public shareholders' interests might be safeguarded and losses could be avoided with early fraud identification.

Challenges in Turning CAs into Reliable Corporate Fraud Whistleblowers

Conflicts of Interest and Independence: Conflicts of interest may arise because the accountants and their clients sometimes have close working connections. They might be deterred from reporting suspicious activity by the urge to keep business relationships intact, particularly if doing so could endanger lucrative contracts or long-term relationships.

Professional Setbacks: Without strong legal protections and substantial rewards,accountants may worry about reprisals, losing their jobs, or facing legal repercussions for reporting fraud. As shown by past regulatory failures, the lack of a solid framework for protecting whistleblowers may discourage them from coming forward.

Complexity and Volume of Transactions: Auditors typically only look at a sample of the thousands of transactions that large firms conduct. Due to its narrow reach, many fraud cases may go unnoticed unless there are obvious warning signs or hints.

The Enron scandal serves as a reminder that private gatekeepers may do nothing despite warning indicators because of systemic flaws, a lack of supervision, or demands from their personal and professional lives. Stronger laws and regulations, required reporting requirements, and more auditor independence have all been demanded as a result of these inadequacies.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates