Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
No Discrepancy Found in Quantitative Stock Quantity for Valuation: ITAT Deletes Addition, Upholds Consistent Valuation Method [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted an addition of ₹95,07,903 made on account of alleged excess stock valuation for...
![Legitimate Trade Should Not Be Crippled: Madras HC Allows Revival of GST Reg Following Suguna Cut Piece Centre Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/08/750x450_2103330-legitimate-trade-madras-hc-0-revival-of-gst-taxscan.webp "Legitimate Trade Should Not Be Crippled: Madras HC Allows Revival of GST Reg Following Suguna Cut Piece Centre Ruling [Read Order]")
![VAT Turnover included in GST Assessment: Madras HC Remits Case for Fresh Consideration as Dealer Fails to Substantiate Replies [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/08/500x300_2103302-vat-turnover-gst-assessment-madras-hc-case-for-fresh-consideration-dealer-fails-substantiate-replies-taxscan.webp "VAT Turnover included in GST Assessment: Madras HC Remits Case for Fresh Consideration as Dealer Fails to Substantiate Replies [Read Order]")
![Gujarat HC Prevents Levy of VAT on Hospital Supplies as Unsustainable by Constitutional Limits [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/07/500x300_2103090-gujarat-hc-prevents-levy-vat-on-hospital-supplies-constitutional-limits-taxscan.webp "Gujarat HC Prevents Levy of VAT on Hospital Supplies as Unsustainable by Constitutional Limits [Read Order]")
No Discrepancy Found in Quantitative Stock Quantity for Valuation: ITAT Deletes Addition, Upholds Consistent Valuation Method [Read Order]
The Tribunal held that when there was no difference in the quantity of stock, and the difference was purely one of valuation, adopting a different valuation method was not valid.
![Supreme Court Dismisses ₹244-Crore Service Tax Demand Against Bharti Airtel Over Employee Call allowance Scheme [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/05/750x450_2102493-employee-call-allowance-scheme-service-tax-demand-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court Dismisses ₹244-Crore Service Tax Demand Against Bharti Airtel Over Employee Call allowance Scheme [Read Order]")
![Non-Service of SCN: Gauhati HC Sets Aside ₹16.37 Lakh Service Tax Demand, Orders Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/04/500x300_2102204-fresh-adjudication-taxscan.webp "Non-Service of SCN: Gauhati HC Sets Aside ₹16.37 Lakh Service Tax Demand, Orders Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand u/s 73(1) of Finance Act: Calcutta HC allows Payment in 8 Instalments, Lifts Account Attachment Subject to Conditions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/04/500x300_2102160-calcutta-high-court-service-tax-demand-finance-act-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand u/s 73(1) of Finance Act: Calcutta HC allows Payment in 8 Instalments, Lifts Account Attachment Subject to Conditions [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Not Payable on Use of Foreign Technology or Trademarks Not Registered Under Indian Law: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/03/500x300_2101876-cestat-chennai-service-tax-foreign-technology-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Not Payable on Use of Foreign Technology or Trademarks Not Registered Under Indian Law: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Service Tax on Book Reversal Entries, Security and Electricity Deposits u/s Section 67 of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/500x300_2101299-service-tax-reversal-entries-electricity-deposits-deposits-section-67-of-finance-act-taxscan.webp "No Service Tax on Book Reversal Entries, Security and Electricity Deposits u/s Section 67 of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Belated Expression of Interest No 'Material Irregularity' in CIRP: NCLAT Sets Aside NCLT Order, Restores CoC-Approved Resolution Plan [Read Order]
The Tribunal set aside the NCLT’s order, which had cancelled the Committee of Creditors’ (CoC) approval of the resolution plan submitted by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) . The NCLAT restored the CoC-approved plan, emphasising that procedural deviations without substantive prejudice cannot nullify a valid resolution
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
Navasree A.MBelated Expression of Interest No 'Material Irregularity' in CIRP: NCLAT Sets Aside NCLT Order, Restores CoC-Approved Resolution Plan [Read Order]
The Tribunal set aside the NCLT’s order, which had cancelled the Committee of Creditors’ (CoC) approval of the resolution plan submitted by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) . The NCLAT restored the CoC-approved plan, emphasising that procedural deviations without substantive prejudice cannot nullify a valid resolution
